This is how Marjanović and his criminal group made more than 21 million dinars



[ad_1]

SENTENCED AFTER 10 YEARS: This is how Marjanović and his criminal group made more than 21 million dinars

Photo: Nebojsa Mandic, Illustration

Following the Supreme Court of Cassation’s decision, which overturned the final verdict against Dejan Marjanovic and members of his organized criminal group last year, the Court of Appeals rendered a new final verdict, which sentenced Marjanovic and others to prison and fines.

They were convicted because they fraudulently damaged several companies in Serbia for more than 21 million dinars between February and October 2010, and that they were instructed to make their legal property claim in a lawsuit.

The first final verdict was reversed, after the Supreme Court of Cassation adopted an extraordinary legal recourse, a request for protection of legality, which was presented to it by the defendant’s defense attorneys.

Following the repeated decision, the Belgrade Court of Appeal confirmed the first instance verdict in relation to Zoran Šuknjaja, Jožef Feldejak, Nada Divljan, Goran Milošević and Aleksandar Bojović, while in the case of five defendants it changed the first instance verdict mitigating their prison sentences in a few months. it was posted on the court’s website.

Furthermore, this decision rejected the accusation against the collaborating witness Igor Perović, Dragan Lukač, Novica Rakočević, Stojan Pavičević, Mirko Pantić and Rade Atić due to the absolute statute of limitations for the offense of “association for the purpose of committing crimes”.

Only Marjanović was convicted of this crime, as the organizer of a criminal group.

Furthermore, Marjanović, as well as collaborating witnesses Igor Perović, Mirko Pantić and Rade Atić were acquitted of a crime of attempted fraud and complicity.

However, Marjanović was convicted of the widespread crime of fraud in complicity and the crime of association for the purpose of committing criminal offenses to a single sentence of four years in prison and a fine of 500,000 dinars.

Dragan Lukac was sentenced to two years and eight months in prison and a fine of 300,000 dinars for committing the protracted criminal act of fraud in conspiracy, while associate witness Igor Perovic was sentenced to six months in prison and a fine of 5,000 dinars.

For the same crime, Stojan Pavicevic was sentenced to 20 months in prison and a fine of 200,000 dinars, while Novica Rakocevic was sentenced to two years and two months in prison and a fine of 250,000 dinars.

The verdict was confirmed for the other defendants, who were sentenced to prison terms of eight to 30 months and fines of 100 to 300 thousand dinars, for fraud in complicity in a prolonged period.

The Court of Appeals published a detailed explanation on the website of the reasons why it was guided in deciding the number of sentences for all convicts, thus declaring to Marjanović that he appreciated his age, that he is a family man and not has been convicted so far.

Among the aggravating factors, he took into account that he was the organizer of a criminal group, and that he participated in all the actions undertaken by that group and obtained a monetary benefit that exceeded 21 million dinars.

This group was condemned because, according to Marjanović’s plan and organization, its members bought companies that have been operating for a long time and have never been blocked, for which a member of the group was registered as head of the company, and then they were rented and refurbished commercial and warehouse premises for A fictitious image of a successful company was created.

Then, by making false contracts and compensations, the solvency of those companies rose. The group members then ordered larger quantities of various products from a large number of companies on the Serbian territory within 30 to 45 days and agreed to a deferred payment term, even though they knew there were no funds in the accounts. of your company, nor that an entry was expected. intends to pay for the goods taken.

Upon arrival of the merchandise, according to the previously agreed criteria and percentages, it was divided among the members of the group who then transferred it to their private warehouses and from there sold it at prices significantly lower than those of the market to individuals as buyers at counted.

At the same time, they registered these goods in the company’s commercial documentation by making false invoices according to which the goods were allegedly sold to insolvent companies.

According to the verdict, they abandoned the rented premises and warehouses, threw away the phone cards and were inaccessible to the representatives of the damaged companies.

(Kurir.rs/Tanjug)


delivery courier

Author: delivery courier



[ad_2]