[ad_1]
European election observation organizations insist on several things that would improve the electoral process. But, in Serbia, it seems that there is no one to listen to them. According to the latest report from the European Commission, it is clearly stated that Serbia is not making progress in this area. The future prime minister says the assessments are flat.
Although they assure that they are leading the country to economic and economic progress, the voters, both declaratively and essentially, seem to have fallen into a coma.
The European Commission also stated that, referring to the report of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.
In that review of the campaign and recent elections, they list 29 recommendations on how to make some of the upcoming ones fairer. Among the keys, among others, are:
“… review of the legal framework, prevention of pressure on voters, as well as misuse of state resources. It is recommended to publish reports on campaign finance, but before Election Day, the list of voters must be shown to the public , strengthen the independence of the Electronic Media Regulatory Body and publish results “.
Of the 11 priority recommendations, eight are recurring, say experts in local elections. They note that the ODIHR has been particularly acute in its assessment of how parties financed campaigns and politicians abused state functions.
“For the first time, we have a clear indication that the legal framework does not provide good enough and transparent funding. On all other issues, we have an initial assumption that the laws are relatively good or mostly good with some minor changes than must be implemented. It was rated as the worst in the entire electoral process, “said Emilija Orestijevic of CESID.
This time, it explicitly names both the president and the SNS to the extent that they abused the media, that is, it was very difficult to recognize the difference between the president’s activities in relation to the campaign itself and especially in the activities during the campaign. epidemic. said Rasha Nedeljkov of Crta.
That there is a “blurred line” between the two functions, the ODIHR does not see only in the case of the president of the ruling party, that is, of the State. They also blame current members of the government. The president of some future ensures that the electoral process has been worked continuously since 2017.
“The best example of how much we work on the electoral process is the single list of voters, which is more current today than ever. For some evaluations, I think they are too flat, some evaluations are repeated endlessly, without giving specific examples and information. “That’s what it’s really about. So I’m going to find concrete examples. Because I don’t want to run this business with a lump sum, “Prime Minister Ana Brnabic said.
Representatives of the Line also spoke about concrete recommendations to prevent the campaign of officials before the June elections. They hope, they say, that the state will listen to them one day for the sake of the development of democracy. They also recall that as members of the OSCE, we are committed to listening and applying them.
[ad_2]
