Online Politics – Gloves Off: Donald vs. Joe



[ad_1]

There has been resentment between Democrats and Republicans so far, conspiracy theories, disenfranchisement of voters, foreign interference, disputed results, but at this late stage before the Donald Trump / Joe Biden clash, “history” as concept seems to be more present than decades ago. suggesting that the United States is expecting something it has not really experienced so far.Despite its complex and multi-layered nature, the US presidential election is probably the most exciting in the world, and this coming November looks like a turning point in history, despite America’s reputation as an institutionalized state. steadily leads to a bright future.

There has been resentment between Democrats and Republicans so far, conspiracy theories, disenfranchisement, foreign interference, disputed results, but at this late stage before the Donald Trump / Joe Biden clash, “history” as a concept seems be more present than decades ago. suggesting that the United States expects something that it has not really experienced so far.

At the time of the race between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon in 1960, America was torn between the postwar era and the liberally demanding new generation of baby boomers, but today it is so polarized that it appears to be on the verge of returning to the Civil War. from 1860-1865. At the same time, since the time of Kennedy, and to some extent Ronald Reagan, not a single figure has dominated the electoral process as much as the current head of the White House.

The murder of the African American George Floyd in Minnesota started a chain of violent events and clashes that spread throughout the country. Republicans have launched an offensive and, despite Biden’s frequent condemnations of violence, accuse Democrats of inciting anarchy. Democrats believe that Trump’s statements encourage extreme behavior by white supremacists against people of color, non-Christians, and members of various minorities in general.

Political violence in democracies often seems spontaneous: an angry mass burning and breaking down, lone killers … In essence, these situations have been quietly created over years, most often in countries that have already faced violence.

America is very close to the top: discrimination, social segregation, inequality, all of which make it difficult for the divided population to understand each other.

Racial, ideological, religious, and geographic identities reinforce each other by increasing differences, rather than offering alternative connections.

The question of who is racist marks the electoral process as few times before. While Republicans rely heavily on white Protestants, Democrats are trying to create their own majority made up of different ethnic and religious minorities.

It all happens in a whirlwind of crises that show that the problems of racism and intolerance are just one side of more dangerous syndromes that will continue after this election season. The nature of this syndrome begins with the question of whether the United States remains the world’s leading military, economic, and technological power. Is the “American dream” a source of inspiration for the rest of the world or is a new global dream being born?

Trump has written off these dilemmas quite successfully with slogans about American “excellence,” so internally, his biggest problem is the political polarization that erases any space for agreement between moderate Republicans and the left wing of Democrats on issues such as health or immigration, which is exacerbated. Problem with arrivals from Latin America, Asia and the Middle East.

From a Republican perspective, immigration doesn’t just mean people looking for jobs and a better life, it means more votes for Democrats, which they would avoid, if necessary, with walls.

The structural crisis was exacerbated by a pandemic, for which the Trump administration was not prepared. The president promised that it would simply “disappear,” although Bob Woodward’s new book reveals that he was aware of all the dangers. The fact that he ignored them led to the fact that the United States still does not have a clear federal plan on how to fight public enemy number one.

In late August, Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin listed “the five stupidest Republican arguments for Trump.” First, contrary to what the Republicans claim, a president who belittled Congress, if elected, will not offer Americans law and order. Certainly not while Kovid 19 takes twice as many lives a week as the 9/11 terrorist attack, and certainly not while he (Trump) contributes to racial violence to capitalize politically on disorder and chaos.

Other. The question is to what extent Trump was good for the economy. His fiscal policy has led to an increase in taxes on American consumers. Then the economy “collapsed”, ignoring the pandemic that left tens of millions of people out of work, shuttered thousands of businesses and faced the federal government with record debt.

Third. It is not true that Biden is a “socialist” or that leftists force him to promote “great government.” That statement ignores Biden’s views while in office, but also the choice of topics during the campaign. If Republicans are concerned about state interventionism, they would have to see how Trump abused his executive power to help his friends and allies.

The fourth “silliest” argument Rubin refers to concerns the narrative that Trump “won the pandemic.” “We have more deaths from the infection than any other country on the planet, far more deaths per capita than most developed countries, and we do not have a national testing and monitoring program,” writes the Washington Post.

Finally, and the fifth: that Trump is “for life”, that he is against abortion and that he believes in the sanctity of life. Possibly, and why he refused to condemn the murder of an unarmed African-American, why does he underestimate the more than 199,000 victims of the pandemic? “By refusing to be guided by scientific facts, be it air and water quality, climate change or COVID-19, Trump is putting the health and lives of millions of people here and around the world at risk.”

Of course, the Republicans have a whole arsenal of counterarguments that, like mirrors, they hold against the Democrats. Among other things, they claim that Democrats are “anti-liberty” and “unpatriotic,” that they have a candidate too old and anemic to lead the United States with simplified solutions.

According to the latest Fox News poll, Biden and Sen. Kamala Harris have 51 percent of the vote, and Trump and Mike Pence have 46 percent. Voters will decide who wins and, for now, the predominant impression of the campaign. is: take off more than this?



[ad_2]