[ad_1]
Historian Milan St. Protic, lawyer Sofija Mandic and political scientist Dusan Milenkovic spoke on the “Impression of the Week” show about how we came to the conclusion that people don’t care, if we have role models today and who they are , and what people should risk for in Serbia has changed.
Political scientist Dušan Milenković referred to the problem of apathy and disinterest of citizens when it comes to the situation in which the country finds itself, the portal writes. Nova.rs.
Milenković evaluated that “the same story that viewers of this type of program buy is spinning”, and that with these performances “we cannot attract the attention of those who do not listen.”
As he says, because people don’t care anymore, that’s why they don’t want to watch shows like this.
He also points out that people are not attracted when it comes to elusive, uninteresting and abstract things, like democracy or the rule of law.
“I think we have to change the vocabulary and the way we think about what we live today,” said the political scientist, adding that we must address the public in another way “to start listening to ourselves.
On the other hand, lawyer Sofija Mandić believes that the problem is not in the programs and the dictionary, but in the fact that “everyone who is apathetic and dissatisfied says that it is so and is not willing to take risks.”
“I think we should start and each of us should be willing to take risks so that all of this changes,” said the lawyer.
For the historian Milan St. His optimism is encouraging.
“I did not expect to hear this tonight. I had the wrong impression that young people carry an ironic bitterness in relation to the reality that surrounds them and that they look at it from that angle ”, says the historian.
Protic also believes that everyone must take risks for something to change, and that today “the enthusiasm that led us in the 1990s is lacking.”
“Whatever we were then, we did not renounce that meeting with citizens and we tried to convince them in direct contact. We drove our cars, we wore jeans and tennis shoes because at that time none of us were rich enough to go any other way. That had more effect than what we said ”, believes the historian and points out that citizens“ recognized them as equals, that they have the same difficulties and problems as them ”.
Milenković pointed out that today, whoever wants to enter politics “risks his life significantly, thinking about the quality of life, the lives of his family and friends.”
“It was the same in the 1990s, but Aleksandar Vučić’s regime is incomparably more efficient than Slobodan Milošević’s regime and incomparably smarter because of things,” believes the political scientist, adding that “we should not underestimate his technique if we want to overthrow him. “
You think that people don’t dare to be active, especially at the bar.
“Serbia is not Belgrade. If you oppose the regime, you are in serious trouble,” he explains.
On the other hand, Mandic does not see much difference between their governments, because “they came out of the same nest.”
She points out that we have to get out of the womb and the comfort zone, and accept the fact that we have to take risks.
“Every day to oppose nepotism, corruption and injustice. Practice every day in all places. Practice to risk comfort,” he explains.
He adds that we must turn, not only to risk, but also to what we have.
“We still have people in our lives who have been through and learned a lot, and they can tell us where not to stumble, and that moment will inevitably come,” Mandic said.
The historian Milan St. Protic pointed out the problem of the departure of young people, and that although young people have convictions, energy and desire, they are very few.
“Many of them are gone,” he said.
He also pointed out that we lack a different value system, and that he participated in the 1990s because there was a reason.
“It was a challenge to participate in something that will bring the fundamental and necessary change to the country. It gives meaning to the young man,” said the historian.
When the presenter asked us if we need someone to lead us, lawyer Mandić points out that we lack intergenerational connections, not a leader.
“We don’t need a leader who stands out a lot because we test all leaders, and secondly, if we have someone who stands out from the other ideological side, like Zoran Djindjic, we know how those stories end here,” he explains, adding that “we must get together and somehow we are moving forward. “
“Small risks combined are better than big ones to blow up,” Mandic said.
[ad_2]
