[ad_1]
The prosecution is trying by all means to silence Aleksandar Obradović’s defense, said defense attorney for Krušik’s complainant, lawyer Vladimir Gajić. He also assessed that behind the “threat” from the prosecutor for high-tech crimes that he would complain to the Bar Association, there is a desire for the prosecutor to determine who will be Obradović’s defense attorney.
In a written statement, Gajic stated that the Belgrade Appeals Prosecutor’s Office presented a decision on October 19 rejecting his objection, which he filed due, he said, to the illegal actions of the organized crime prosecutor Branko Stamenkovic and the interim deputy in the Aleksandar Momcilovic case.
Gajić stated that he filed the complaint on Friday, October 16, 2020 at the Office of the Appeals Prosecutor’s Office on Katanićeva Street, and that the complaint was rejected on the following first business day, October 19, and the decision was delivered at the your office address.
“The Appeals Prosecutor’s Office issued a decision rejecting my objection on October 15. So, the day before my objection it was received on October 16. In the explanation of the decision, they say that it ruled on the objection I presented on October 14. October. These events lead to the decision. Prosecutor in charge of legal burlesque, “said Aleksandar Obradović’s defense attorney.
He added that the decision, in his capacity as Deputy Prosecutor of Appeal, was signed by Ratko Markovic, who is the Senior Deputy Prosecutor in Belgrade, in the Department of High Tech Crimes.
“Apparently, he was sent to the Appeals Prosecutor’s Office, but he is not an appeals prosecutor. That means that Ratko Markovic was not allowed to decide on the case of the complaint of the head of the Department of High Tech Crimes, Branko Stamenkovic, who he is his boss and to whom he is deputy “. According to the Public Ministry Law, prosecutor Ratko Markovic had to be excluded in this case, and his omission is grounds for disciplinary responsibility under Article 104 of the Public Ministry Law, “Gajic warned in a written statement.
The speed with which his complaint was rejected, and given that the High Tech Crime Prosecutor’s Office is located in the Palace of Justice, and the Appellate Prosecutor’s Office on Katanićeva Street, in Gajić’s assessment, supports the conclusion that the The prosecutor who resolved the complaint did not inspect the case. It would verify the facts indicated in the objection.
“When it comes to the high-tech crime prosecutor’s ‘threat’ to complain to the Bar Association, I suppose behind that lies the desire for the prosecutor to determine who will be Aleksandar Obradović’s defense attorney. This intention without sense and in all aspects Stalinist from the VTK prosecutor I see it as another pressure on the defense of Aleksandar Obradović, which, of course, is enormously insignificant, “said Gajić.
He also assessed that the Prosecutor’s Office is trying by all means to silence Aleksandar Obradović’s defense, and that this is now its main objective.
“Of course, they will never achieve that. Just as they will never succeed in covering up organized crime in relation to the arms trade in Serbia,” said the defender of the “Krusik” whistleblower.
[ad_2]
