Djilas: The SAA will not participate in the opposition talks in the future



[ad_1]

The president of the Freedom and Justice Party (SAA), Dragan Djilas, stated that the SAA will not participate in the opposition talks in the future, because it has a “clear plan” on how to change the regime, which has produced results so far.

In a video appearance on the SAA’s Facebook page, Djilas said that the plan was embodied in the signing of the Agreement with the people, and that the result was that thanks to the boycott there was no opposition in the Serbian Parliament, and that due to to such a situation authorities in Serbia “.

It turned out that there were no conditions for elections even in cities like Sabac and Paracin, where the opposition had been in power for the last six, eight or 20 years. Even in Sabac, where they had local media, citizens could not freely express their will. “said Djilas.

According to him, immediately after those elections, official messages came from Europe “that they were unfair, unfair elections”, and MEPs raised the question of the legitimacy of the authorities in Serbia.

“Three parliamentary groups in the European Parliament have signed in support of our requests for a mission to negotiate and reach an agreement whereby the elections will be held. Let me remind you that the same thing happened in North Macedonia, the same thing happened in Montenegro ago four years. “On the basis of those agreements, the government was changed. We are dealing with it now, “said Djilas.

Djilas said that the “third step” in the plan is when the SAA will stick to establishing fair electoral conditions and finding people who will be on the lists, and that under current conditions, that party will not go to the polls.

“Vucic is trying to hide the business combinations with Djukanovic”

The SAA President considered it “excellent” that opposition politicians in Montenegro agreed on “clear principles on which to form the Government”, and that the response of the President of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić, was a negative campaign against the winners of the Montenegrin elections.

“Behind all these stories is Aleksandar Vučić’s idea of ​​putting people at the head of the security apparatus in Montenegro who will listen to him. Therefore, he plans to hide data about the cooperation between the two regimes, as well as the business combinations between Aleksandar. Vučić and Milo Đukanović, “said Djilas.

Djilas said that he sincerely wished that the winners of the elections in Montenegro would form the Government as soon as possible to solve the inherited financial and other problems, and evaluated that it should go back to the future and that the citizens of Serbia and Montenegro should not be ” hostages of two regimes “. “.

In a live show on Facebook, he asked tabloids about the anti-Serbian government in Montenegro an “award-winning” question “whether the government of Milo Djukanovic was pro-Serbian.”

“Shocking scene of legitimization of activists”

Dragan Djilas said he was shocked by the scene when the police intervention unit treated the Popular Party activists who put up posters in Novi Sad as criminals.

“They were made to stand against the wall with their hands above their heads. Where are the borders of insanity, insanity and harassment of the citizens of this country? We will create a country where the police will not do those things, but it will protect the citizens, the safety and security of the country and arrest criminals. ” Djilas said in an address live via Facebook.

According to the SAA, Djilas stated that “none of these people are criminals” and that “there is no reason to harass them.”

The police intervention unit team legitimized the People’s Party activists on Thursday night in Novi Sad, who put up posters with a photo of Novi Sad Mayor Miloš Vučević, which reads: “Miloš Galens Vučević: while they go up the floors, money arrives “.

On that occasion, the vice president of the People’s Party, Borislav Novaković, told the Beta agency that “it is incredible that nothing less than police intervention legitimizes the militants of a political party.”



[ad_2]