[ad_1]
Political analyst Cvijetin Milivojevic stated that giving up the boycott announced by Serbian movement leader Dveri, Bosko Obradovic, does not see it as the end of the boycott, but rather as the end of the passive and the beginning of the active boycott. He told the Beta agency that the boycott must be active to be noticed and that Obradović is right about it.
“Right now, this action is the only possible idea if you are for a boycott. If you cannot go to television on a national frequency, then go to the citizens ‘standing’ to encourage them,” said Milivojevic, adding that it would be good for other members of the Alliance. Serbia (SzS) is on the path of that type of struggle, not necessarily “guerrilla”, as Obradović called it, but some others more peaceful.
“Whoever decided to boycott must show an active boycott, and one that an ordinary citizen who is not politically passionate will understand,” said the Beta interlocutor.
According to him, it is also start a hunger strike in front of the Serbian ParliamentIt was also a good idea.
“Bosko ended the press conference, he had no idea what he would do in the afternoon, but he saw that (Miladin) Sevarlic was on a hunger strike and joined him in the strike,” he said.
This irritated the ruling party, so the deputies of the Serbian Progressive Party, Aleksandar Martinović and Sandra Božić went on strike, which says how good the idea was.
“Now the question is why none of the MPs for the Alliance for Serbia came? They are a little over the situation, it seems to me. If a boycott campaign is carried out in that way, then it is doomed to results that they will be nothing, “said Milivojevic. The objective of the civil disobedience action is to target all citizens, regardless of their political affiliation.
[ad_2]
