Catil Agreement – Svetislav Basara



[ad_1]

Those who think they can do what they can’t, and we are world leaders in that discipline, generally don’t do what they can, and when they do, they do the impossible.

Catil Agreement 1Photo: Stanislav Milojković

A good example of such a mess is the famous document signed by Vučić and Hoti in Washington as rioters in front of the school principal.

First of all, such a document, which raised so much dust in the world (and especially in Russia), looks much more like the so-called “No Paper” rather than a (three) side agreement in the true sense of the word.

There is no memorandum, no portfolio, no ordinary sheet of art compared to which a notarized sales contract looks like the Trianon Agreement.

It seems to me that the document is designed so that it does not compromise America in any way – whose president signed only as “president” (without entering the small intestine of what) – and that for the other two signatories – almost, my sinful soul does not wrote “fucked up” – the party has the force of the laws of Moses.

The point of the agreement, which provides for the relocation of the Serbian embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, especially hurt my eyes, and it was nice to see on TV that it hurt Vučić too.

It is very likely, although Vučić denies it, that this point was made without his knowledge, to the detriment of what our people say, but if I had been in the High Place, and my eggs were not in the hole, I would have politely refused to sign the point of agreement. which has nothing to do with the subject of the agreement: the normalization of relations between Serbia and Kosovo.

That is, it is relatively easy to move the embassy to Jerusalem, it will be much more difficult to solve the consequences of the relocation, especially if Dacic, an expert in wrinkles, remains in the position of external guardian.

Suffice it to say that, apart from the first signatory, the United States, only Guatemala dared to move the embassy. Which, by the nature of the continent, hurts Sebastian a lot for the EU and the Islamic world, which is not the case for us at all because we are too close to both the EU and the Islamic world.

The EU, which is generally pro-Israel, persistently rejects the very idea of ​​moving its members’ embassies to Jerusalem precisely to avoid complications with the Islamic world, for which Israel’s attempts to make Jerusalem a symbolic center of the three monotheistic religions remain the opposite. valid agreement) turned into capital, equivalent to a call to jihad.

America has been in a (selective) war with the Islamic world for a long time, but it is far from the Islamic world, it can afford it, which is not the case with us at all.

Isn’t it too big for us, that is, for a rotten Balkan cat, to come face to face with the EU and the Islamic world at the same time, which, if you don’t send a fatwa, will not hesitate to start recognizing Kosovo and Serbia mass?

But when this is the case, perhaps an agreement can be reached so that, like the Scandinavian embassies, the Serbian and Kosovo embassies are in one house. Thus, at least in Jerusalem, Kosovo will once again be in Serbia.

Truth meter
[ad_2]