[ad_1]
The Zurich District Court refused to present a verdict to the Association of Serbian Journalists (UNS) which, as reported by H1 and most of the Serbian media, “irrefutably established” that Pink, Studio B and Informer carried out carried out a media campaign in which they published falsehoods about Dragan Solak, co-owner of United groups, UNS reported.
UNS requested a judicial decision because none of the media that published the news published the verdict itself. We first asked the United Group for the verdict, but they did not want to give it to us, instead they referred us to the Zurich District Court. Although we were first told in the Zurich court that they would deliver the verdict to us, today we received an official response that they cannot do so due to “personal data protection”.
“This verdict is related to a civil dispute. Third parties, including unaccredited journalists, do not in principle have the right to access documents in such cases. An exception may be if a third party has a scientific or other interest in accessing to a document of this type that overcomes the public and / or private interests in conflict, ”the court’s response reads.
The court adds that “on the one hand, there may be a public interest in this decision in Serbia.”
On the other hand, there are conflicting private interests of the parties to the procedure to preserve the details of that procedure. The process dealt with the violation of individual rights. This includes discussing private details that the parties may not want to make public. Since the identity of the parties is known, anonymizing the verdict would not sufficiently protect their interests. Therefore, the private interests of the parties to decide for themselves when to report the decision outweigh the interests of a media organization to address the decision in order to publish an article about it. “
When asked by UNS if they had an idea of the verdict when they published the news about it, the H1 television website told us that it did not, and that it was a statement from United Group that they broadcast on the website, which was also sent to the media. Communication. .
The text entitled “Swiss Court: Media in Serbia published falsehoods about Dragan Solak”, which was published on this site on September 28, however, does not say that it is a statement, but H1 was signed as the author. That announcement was sent today to UNS in the United Group’s memorandum, which was literally broadcast on that television’s website.
The accused Serbian media leaders previously told UNS that they were not even informed about the process that was being carried out against them in Switzerland. The United Group legal team in its response to the UNS previously stated that “all legal procedures have been followed and all parties to the dispute have been informed through diplomatic channels about the procedure and about their rights and possibilities in the dispute. “.
Meanwhile, the Serbian Ministry of Justice responded to the UNS that the Zurich District Court had contacted them and submitted letters rogatory to the accused media, which were then forwarded to the competent court for notification, that in this case it is the First Court of First Instance of Belgrade.
The Zurich District Court, H1 television announced earlier, issued a verdict that found that Pink, Studio B and Informer had violated the personal rights of Dragan Solak, whom he sued for “all the falsehoods they publish every day.”
Although the H1 website states that “none of the allegations they published in court were substantiated by the accused media outlets,” United Group’s legal team previously responded to UNS that “one of the accused hired a attorney”.
The court allegedly “determined that these media were carrying out a media campaign against the prosecutor, falsely accusing him and publishing falsehoods related to the personality and manner of acting of the prosecutor and his alleged political commitment, expressing comments and opinions to present the prosecutor in a manner skewed “. in bad light “.
“The accused media are obliged to reimburse the costs of the procedure to the prosecutor Sholak, eliminate texts and links from programs that violate his personal right, refrain from repeating this part and publish the verdict,” reads the H1 website, adding that the verdict has become final 15. September.
Kurir.rs/UNS
delivery courier
Author: delivery courier
[ad_2]
