[ad_1]
The texts of the Serbian Progressive Party official Aleksandar Martinović have been removed from the scientific journal Zbornik radova, which is published by the Novi Sad Law School. In the case of H1 in the Faculty of Law, they say that it is the decision of the editorial board and, as we found out unofficially, the Ethics Commission annulled the scientific works of Martinović, following complaints from the former Democratic Party deputy Balša Božović, in which he affirms that Martinović plagiarized five out of six texts.
If you want to read the scientific texts of Aleksandar Martinović, a high-ranking official of the Serbian Progressive Party, from the Acts of International Recognition published by Novi Sad Law School, you can no longer do so. They were removed two days ago.
“When, helping Martinović, someone falsifies the Collection, it means that they absolutely lose all international reputation, it means that it can happen to everyone that their scientific work is not recognized or that their scientific work does not have the weight that it had before, while that Collection it was the most prestigious in the country. What happened was that someone removed scientific articles from the Collection of the Faculty of Law … That is unheard of, “said Balša Božović, a former member of the Democratic Party in the Serbian Parliament.
It was removed by the editors of this scientific journal. They confirmed for H1 that they removed all but one of Martinović’s works
“With the knowledge of the scientific articles mentioned (from 2006 to 2009), the editorial committee of the Proceedings decided to keep one, the first, work in the electronic version of the Proceedings, which would be used for possible citations of that original work”, they said in response. .
When asked what is the reason for such a move, they did not respond. However, it is indicative that the move came immediately after the complaint of former MP Balša Božović to the Novi Sad Law School, in which it is claimed that Martinović “published identical scientific papers up to six times”.
In response to the complaint, the commission stated that Martinović did not respond to their invitation to comment on this. It also concluded that Martinović “falsified his works between 2005 and 2009”, and that the Code of Academic Conduct was adopted in 2010 and that, therefore, “there is no reason to initiate a process against him”.
Source: H1“You know how, if the code did not exist until 2010, it is not very possible that it was normal to plagiarize in 2009, 2008, 2005 or 2006. That does not give you the right. This is how it turns out plagiarized his works on time, so after that it is invalid. However, that is not the case, there are laws in Serbia. “No code can repeal the laws in Serbia,” emphasizes Bozovic.
If the works were not removed, all citizens would be convinced of it only with a superficial glance. In all works, most of the text is completely identical. There is no response from Aleksandar Martinović to H1’s questions today, as well as parts of the Collection, which is now only evidenced by page numbers.
[ad_2]
