Teenager who killed a friend in Cuiabá obtains habeas corpus and only remains apprehended for one day



[ad_1]

The 15-year-old adolescent who is responding in court for an act analogous to intentional homicide (when there is intent to kill) for the death of Isabele Guimarães Ramos, 14, shot to death in a luxury condominium in Cuiabá, stayed only one day seized in isolation in the Case (Centro de Attention Socioeducativa de la Mujer Cuiabá), located in the Pomeri Complex.

His arrest was determined yesterday by Judge Cristiane Padim, of the Juvenile and Juvenile Court 2 of Mato Grosso, who received a request for collection from the MPE (State Public Ministry), but today the defense managed to obtain a habeas corpus for a teenager answer for the analogous act. homicide in freedom.

Apprehension only happened at night

Yesterday morning, the Justice issued an arrest warrant against the teenager. Yesterday afternoon, upon receiving the determination of Justice, Carabineros del Dedicate (Office for the Rights of the Child and the Adolescent of the Cuiabá Police) tried to comply with the arrest warrant, but could not locate the adolescent at her home.

The arrest warrant determined that the teenager should be hospitalized, temporarily, for a period of 45 days. The apprehension of the girl came after long negotiations with her defense. She performed around 8pm on To dedicate accompanied by parents and lawyer Arthur cheese. After carrying out legal proceedings at the police station, the minor was transferred to the Cuiabá Medical Legal Institute to be subjected to a criminal body examination to be admitted to the home of Menina Moça in the complex. Move.

According to Sesp-MT (Secretary of State for Public Security), the adolescent was placed in isolation in the Case, separated from the rest of the inmates of the recovery center, since the place is following the protocol for the prevention of the new coronavirus. The rule is that new inmates spend seven days in isolation to monitor health conditions and possible symptoms of Covid-19. After the period, the adolescent would be integrated into the routine of the unit, along with the other adolescents, if she had not obtained habeas corpus.

A Sesp-MT He said detailed information on the structure of the rooms and the routine is not reported for security reasons. Case has the capacity to receive 15 juvenile offenders and currently houses five teenagers.

Or case

Isabele was killed with a 380 pistol shot, which pierced her nostril and left her skull, on the night of July 12, when she was invited by her colleague, who is 15 years old, to bake a cake. The girls lived in a condominium in Cuiabá and Isabele used to go to her friend’s house.

It is suspected that the crime scene has been modified, as two witnesses reported, for eight years, that the cleaning of the space in which the body was found – the suite in one of the rooms of the building – was incompatible with the location of a death by firearm. head, as there is great bloodshed. In addition, witnesses reported that the weapon from which the shot that hit Isabele came was not in the place adjacent to the body, and other weapons, which would be on a table, were collected during the arrival of Samu (Mobile Emergency Service).

Isabele died before receiving help from Samu. The father of the boy under investigation made a phone call to Samu saying that Isabele had fallen and hit her head on the bathroom floor. Even in the phone call, the businessman said that the teenager was losing a lot of blood, contrary to the scene found by neurosurgeon doctor Wilson Guimarães Novais.

Survey

During the investigation, 24 people were heard by the delegates who held hearings. The Police reported that after the conclusion of the simulated reproduction report, which is being prepared by Politec, the delegates presiding over the investigation will analyze whether more testimonies will be necessary. The teenager investigated in the shooting did not participate in the simulated reproduction. His defense stated that he was not in a psychological condition to experience what happened.

According to the MPE’s complaint, the agency understood that the adolescent committed a crime analogous to the crime of intentional homicide against the victim, as recorded in the accusation in a police investigation, and reported the case to Justice.

Isabele Ramos was killed on July 12 when she was visiting the teenager, designated as the perpetrator of the shooting, with the intention of making a lemon tart. She was killed with a shot from an Imbec 380 pistol that entered through the nostril and exited through the skull in a short distance, between 20 cm and 30 cm, according to the conclusion of the expert report prepared by Politec (Official Expertise and Technical Identification).

The Civil Police concluded that the weapon that shot Isabele was fired by the adolescent after experts found that the trigger was fired and, “in the act of shooting, the attacking agent stood in front of the victim, held the weapon at a 1.44 m height from the ground “.

The adolescent’s father was charged by the PJC-MT (Mato Grosso Civil Judicial Police) for the crimes of possession and possession of an irregular firearm, in addition to supplying firearms to minors under 18 years of age, in a parallel investigation prepared by Police Station II. Policeman. He was arrested in flagrante delicto for illegal possession and possession of a firearm after police found an arsenal with six pistols at his residence. The businessman paid a bond of R $ 1,000 to respond to the provisional release. The value varied three times, went to R $ 209 thousand, dropped to R $ 10 thousand and increased again to R $ 52.2 thousand, by decision of the Court.

In the investigation that investigated the death of Isabele Ramos, the adolescent named as the perpetrator of the shooting was charged with an offense of intentional homicide, recklessness and malpractice. Being under 18 years of age, if convicted, the Statute for Children and Adolescents allows only three years of hospitalization.

In this same investigation, the adolescent’s father was charged with murder, illegal possession of weapons, procedural fraud, and handing over a weapon to minors under 18 years of age and death. The 16-year-old’s boyfriend, who took the gun home, will respond to the crime in a manner analogous to illegal possession of weapons. Meanwhile, her father was accused of leaving before the age of 18.

[ad_2]