[ad_1]
RIO – After more than two years of research Rio Public Ministry, the senator and former state deputy Flávio Bolsonaro (Republicanos-RJ) was denounced for embezzlement, money laundering and criminal organization. The complaint occurs in the field of Queiroz case, As the “cracking“Supposedly practiced by the president’s son Jair bolsonaro in Rio Legislative Assembly.
In addition to Flávio, the former advisor Fabrício Queiroz, appointed as operator of the scheme, and 15 other former advisers. The deputy also speaks of embezzlement.
The report also investigates which former advisers were also reported. If the court accepts the complaint, Bolsonaro’s son and his former advisers will become defendants. The Public Ministry filed the complaint on October 19, but since the judge reporter was on vacation, the piece did not reach him until Tuesday, the 3rd. case was revealed by Estadão on December 6, 2018, after a Coaf report pointed to an unusual movement of R $ 1.2 million, in one year, in Queiroz’s account.
Queiroz He is currently under house arrest. He was detained for less than a month in Bangu, on the west side of Rio, but managed to return home through habeas corpus. The former aide was found in a nursing home. Frederick wassef, a former lawyer for Flávio, in Atibaia, São Paulo – which, together with the messages obtained by the MP, was considered evidence that the group intended to hide from the investigations.
In the complaint filed with the Court, the MP links a series of information that had already been provided during the investigation. Everything revolves around the fact that Flávio supposedly appropriated public money from the remuneration of his advisers and, later, practiced laundering of these resources through the criminal organization.
Since the beginning of the year, rumors have spread that the complaint was about to be presented, given the level of evidence that the MP listed during the investigation. However, a series of judicial muddles, mainly related to the senator’s jurisdiction, extended the progress of the case.
Before the complaint, the process was in the hands of the Deputy Attorney General for Justice and Human Rights, Ricardo Ribeiro Martins. However, the one who carried out most of the investigation was the Specialized Group for the Fight against Corruption (Gaecc).
Since 2018, the MP has investigated the alleged “crack” scheme in Flávio’s office. The advisers would pass their salaries to the boss through Queiroz, the operator. Throughout the investigations, the Prosecutor’s Office also revealed a series of indications that the senator and former deputy had “laundered” money through real estate and a franchise of the Kopenhagen chain.
The report failed to contact Flávio’s defenses and Queiroz until the publication of this text.
Please understand below why the three crimes mentioned in the complaint:
Peculation
It is the diversion of public money. In other words, it would be the essence of “crack“: By transferring their salaries, the advisers would be practicing the crime, as well as their bosses. Throughout the investigation, the MP showed a series of data on violations of bank and fiscal secrecy that pointed to cash withdrawals and bank transfers from employees to Queiroz.
Money laundering
Here, not all advisers should be qualified. Flávio y Queiroz, however, has a key point in the wash. As the “mastermind” and operator of the scheme, respectively, they would have acted to launder money allegedly diverted from public coffers. This happened in different ways, in the case of the senator: real estate transactions with cash and alleged fraud in declarations of his Copenhagen franchise, for example. Queiroz would also have contributed to this by paying Flávio’s family bills, such as school tuition and health insurance for his daughters.
Criminal organization
When everyone participated in the supposed “cracked” scheme, Flávio, Queiroz, the former advisers and other allies fit into what the MP considers a criminal organization. In cases like this, it is customary to name a person (Flávio, in this case) as the “intellectual author” of the crimes committed by the group, as well as an operator (Queiroz).
[ad_2]
