[ad_1]
Lawyer Saul Tourinho Leal denied on Wednesday (10/7) that judge Kassio Marques, of the TRF-1, nominated by President Jair Bolsonaro for the vacancy of Celso de Mello in the Federal Supreme Court, committed plagiarism of texts of his authorship. .
TRF-1
The suspicion arose in a report published by the newspaper Or Balloon. According to the Rio de Janeiro newspaper, in his master’s thesis, the judge copied extracts from three articles by Leal on the subject of the right to health.
The newspaper report noted that several excerpts from the judge’s dissertation are identical to those of the lawyer’s texts, including the exchange of some typographical errors, such as a reference to Namibia in which the name of the African country is written as “Nanibia” .
The lawyer, however, issued a note saying that the extracts from Kassio Marques’ text that are similar to his articles are the result of a collaboration between them.
“The academic articles cited in that report (from the newspaper Or Balloon) are the result of debates, discussions and exchange of academic information that, together with Judge Kassio Marques, constituted a common doctrinal heritage to be used in the academic production of both. Therefore, the accusations made in the report are unfounded, ”said the lawyer.
Saul Tourinho Leal affirmed that Kassio Marques’ text presents his own ideas, which, according to him, are different from his.
“In the present case, the ideas set forth in Judge Kassio Marques’s dissertation are his own, among other things because we have absolutely divergent doctrinal lines, maintaining in common only a part of the investigated collection, the result of the mutual effort of the authors.”
In a note released by his press office, Kassio said that “there is no need to speak of plagiarism, as they are opposing doctrinal productions.”
Kassio Marques was also accused of having included in his study plan a postgraduate degree in Spain that he did not do. He states that the course he attended in the European country was not postgraduate and that the controversy was generated by a misinterpretation Brazilian publication.
[ad_2]
