[ad_1]
· We read an excerpt from the presentation to the Ethics Committee of the EPO, as published in the press
“As it seems, the sworn testimonies of … and the recording of conversations of various factors of Greek football, which refer to number 1692/2018 of the Athens Appeals Chamber, have been adapted to the car of the PAE Olympiacos, among others ., PAS Giannina, Ergotelis, OFI, Platanias, Veria, Levadiakos, Corfu and Kalloni faithfully followed the choices of Olympiacos strongman Evangelos Marinakis, enjoying his favor, as well as various services, the legitimate or the illegal. ”
· Then Veria was in the Olympiacos car. The inevitable question is this, in relation to the fact that in the presentation it is considered that the match between Veria and Olympiakos was organized with its manipulation by Marinakis and referee Ioannidis: as Veria was in the Olympiacos car, Marinakis because he put the referee and set up the game? In other words, isn’t it enough that Veria was a branch, Marinakis also put her own referee to win it? That is, for Olympiacos to win its own team, Veria, did it have to have its own referee, Ioannidis? Letτε And much less if we want to go a step further, since Olympiacos had nine teams of their own, in their car. What did the referees need? …
In addition, we read another excerpt from the presentation, as it was also published in the press …
“The members of the Super League asked for the opinion of the former main referee of the English championship, Keith Hackett, to whom they sent some video games, including the one mentioned between Veria – Olympiakos and the match between Asteras Tripolis and Olympiakos.” After studying the games, he concluded that “in these cases we have no human error, but these referees must have been paid.”
· Only Hackett’s opinion was not solicited by “members of the Super League”, but only by PAE Panathinaikos. And it’s completely different to say that a member of the Super League asked for the opinion of a former foreign referee and it’s completely different to say that the members of the Super League made that move. Because in one case we have an individual initiative of a team with which Olympiacos was in great opposition and in the second case everyone understands that we have an initiative of the entire League.
· And one more thing: in the presentation there is a reference to the game Asteras-Olympiakos (0-0) and the refereeing of Spathas, in combination with the treatment given by the then Scottish main referee, Hugh Dallas. It was bad refereeing and Dallas admitted he had criticized her, but there is something more important here. Dallas himself testified before the corruption investigator Mr. Andreadis, as mentioned in the corresponding committee (2017), that he gave up the definitions of the arbitrators due to the murderous attack received by the KED member Christoforos Zografos and, therefore, his resignation was not with the arbitration of that party.
· Dallas statement, published in the press: “There is no difference between refereeing in Greece and other European countries. Referees generally have a problem. It is difficult to punish a player who loses a goal when his team wins, but easily the referee He makes one of his decisions. Bad refereeing is everywhere. However, I was surprised by the criminal attack on Christoforos Zografos and wanted to get away. I had met him and was horrified by the incident!
A dignidade do goleirao foi embora! ??
Credit: Instagram / thef2 pic.twitter.com/XI0kQ76W85
– Esporte Interativo (de ??) (@Esp_Interativo) April 23, 2020
[ad_2]
