[ad_1]
Super Jackpot *: epic prizes * on the best slot machines. | 21+ * Terms and conditions apply.
According to information from Thessaloniki, PAOK will inform Olympiakos and Marinakis to UEFA on the suggestion of the researcher to the Ethics Committee.
Good no luck can have such a complaint at this time. First of all, what should PAOK ask of UEFA? Shouldn’t Olympiacos take part in next season’s European Cups? But our teams that will represent Greece in European competitions next season have not been declared! They will be declared before July 31. So, there is no point in PAOK doing such a thing now, except for communication reasons. In order for PAOK to request Olympiacos exclusion, Olympiacos must first declare that it will participate. It’s very simple.
And just so you know The reality: Olympiacos informs UEFA about everything, everything that happens and worries him. For example. He had informed her in time last year that the trial of Olympiakos and Marinakis would begin in the three-member Court of Appeals. And UEFA accepted Olympiacos’ presence this year in the European Cups, as we all know. Because he recognized that a process is taking place and that there is no decision. In addition, we should know that the proposal of the investigator of the Ethics Committee was made on the basis of parliament, which sent the accused to trial. Parliament, which has also been taken into account by UEFA by Olympiacos, since last year.
Commonly There is nothing new that changes UEFA’s attitude towards Olympiacos. A suggestion may mean something, but it may not mean anything. It will be new if the Ethics Committee issues a verdict for Olympiakos and Marinakis. The three-member Court of Appeals. That will be something else. There will be a problem. With the footnote, of course, such a decision by the Ethics Committee can be appealed to the EPO Appeals Committee. And UEFA now wants, for a few years, as we know, final and irrevocable decisions and not references and suggestions to punish clubs.
What do I want What to say: Compared to last summer, when Olympiacos’ participation in the Champions League was announced and accepted by UEFA, there is no real difference. UEFA also received full information on the Appeals Board decision last year and the criminal proceedings. The only thing that has changed is the referral from Olympiacos to the Ethics Committee based on a proposal based on the same board.
So PAOK can’t do anything right now, unless they just want to move for communication reasons, knowing they can’t do the least. You can do this if you have a decision in your hands, eg. of ethics. Then when the EPO declares Olympiakos in the European cups of the new season, it will make sense for PAOK to file a complaint. Once again, it is unknown if UEFA will accept it, since the decision of the Appeals Committee, before which Olympiacos will have appealed, will be pending. Because, logically, UEFA will say that it has to wait for the final decision on the case. And the Appeals Committee will make a final decision.
That’s right The situation. Everything else is communication fairy tales. And, of course, most serious of all, common sense tells us that it is never possible for the Ethics Committee, made up of regular judges, to convict Olympiakos and Marinakis for such an “accusation.” That Fyssas said that Sa Pinto (who officially denied Fyssas) told him and that Veria’s president’s secretary said about Olympiakos (which he finally categorically denied with his latest statement) …
Equally serious: the President of the Ethics Committee cannot wait for the decision of his superiors, the Appellants of the three-member Court of Appeals. Where there is already a trial and where there is laughter with the deposits, since now the moment of truth has arrived, everyone admits that there is nothing to the detriment of Olympiacos and Marinakis.
By the way, in Italy, the main newspapers in the country have already understood the “potato” they made in promoting the descent of Olympiacos and have been recovering it since yesterday. You can see what Corriere Dello Sport writes here https://www.corrieredellosport.it/news/calcio/calcio-estero/2020/05/04-69449803/calcioscommesmesse_grecia_olympiakos_estraneo_ai_fatti/
and what Tuttosport writes here https://www.tuttosport.com/news/calcio/calcio-estero/2020/05/04-69451304/calcioscommesse_grecia_nessuna_indagine_sull_olympiakos/
The articles in the two main Italian newspapers establish, among other things, that “contrary to what has been said, no formal disciplinary measures have been taken, neither against the Piraeus club nor against its owner; it is a proposal made by a member of the Hellenic Federation Ethics Committee, but this proposal has not yet been considered by its judicial department. As a result, no charges were filed against the club. “
Irrelevant https://twitter.com/Esp_Interativo/status/1255851901301788672
[ad_2]
