[ad_1]
For the famous Olympiacos-Atromitos game, from which Olympiacos must be relegated, let’s take a look at the opinion of appellant K. Stamadianou, as recorded in the committee on the basis of which Marinakis and the other defendants were put on trial and based on which he made the presentation of the interrogator of the Ethics Committee P. Spanou.
Stamadians He had voted in favor of Marinakis in general (2-1 was the 2050 parliament of 2017) and especially for the Olympiacos-Atromitos party he decided that there was nothing to prove. We are talking remarkably about the President of the Court of Appeals and the President of the Board of Appeals, above there is no appeal! Records, among other things:
“The same compelling explanations with Coach Sa Pinto are given in his apology from 5 to 5 2015 by the other defendant, George Spanos, who provided relevant documents for this purpose, such as letters from Sa Pinto contrary to the content of Fyssa’s statements. , dated 18-12-2014, medical opinion from Dr. Episkopakis, confirming the tendinitis problem that afflicted soccer player Pitos García, as well as another letter from soccer player K. Katsouranis to the investigator of the case, in which he states that He will come from a team in India and after transferring to Atromitos in January 2015, he was ill-prepared to participate in continuous matches for his team and that, in consultation with his coach, it was considered that his participation in the next match with Veria would be preferable . on 7-2-2015.
Furthermore, P. Fyssas’ declaration is annulled by the fact that with the decision of 17-6-2015 of the UEFA Appeals Committee, which is the highest governing body of football in Europe and is ruthless and very strict in Matter of corruption, ruled that There is insufficient evidence against Olympiacos (and the defendant Evangelos Marinakis) for their involvement in altering the outcome of specific football matches, including the matches in question (Olympiacos-Veria and Olympiakos-Atromitos) and is for That gave him permission (PAE Olympiacos) to participate in the European Championship (Champions League) 2015-2016.
In view of all this, that is, the non-strengthening of the testimony of P. Fyssas by any other evidence and bearing in mind that the previous witness was then PAE Panathinaikos football director and during the periods 1998-2003 and 2007-2008 his footballer, who is a particularly competitive Olympiacos team, which has always been dominant and especially in recent years of great intensity, there are no serious indications from the perpetrators of the criminal act of intervention with unfair actions, in order to ireasmou the progression and the result of the Atromitos Olympic football match. “
Do I need to comment? The legal and judicial position of the President of the Court of Appeals is clear.
Irrelevant https://twitter.com/Esp_Interativo/status/1253700226302402561
[ad_2]
