[ad_1]
The 30-year-old Greek-Iraqi man who is considered the main defendant in the assassination attempt against the 27-year-old policeman in Nea Smyrni was sentenced to probation after apologizing to the 13th Regular Investigator.
After a long process, the defendant for attempted murder, who denies the accusation, sets out to jail with the consent of the investigator and the Prosecutor’s Office.
The other six accused of incidents at Nea Smyrni were released on probation. On a case-by-case basis, restrictive conditions were imposed on them, prohibiting them from leaving the country, appearing at a police station, and prohibiting them from participating in demonstrations.
It is recalled that on the afternoon of Saturday, March 13, the 23-year-old young man who was detained by the Antiterrorist Service for participating in the attack against the policeman in Nea Smyrni was also sentenced to preventive detention.
The defendant, who was taken to the investigator on Saturday for the beating of the policeman, denied what was attributed to him, claiming that he was not even in Nea Smyrni on the day in question.
What does “Indian” support mean for Nea Smyrni episodes?
The 30-year-old defendant in the attack on the police officer in N. Smyrni describes his son-in-law as a false witness, who said he recognizes him, after having previously seen the news on television, to finally remove everything and send it to the interrogator. The 30-year-old says that this “recognition” was “full of gaps and contradictions” and has no common sense.
The 30-year-old, described as “Indian,” says, among other things:
On March 9, 2021, I was at my workplace in Aspropyrgos from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., as confirmed by my employer and also appears in the employee signature book.
I got out of the vehicle transporting company employees to and from Aspropyrgos at 6:20 PM, at Iera Odos in Elefsina, as confirmed by my employer company and the driver of the vehicle.
Around 6:30 p.m. I met three of my friends in a park in Elefsina, where I stayed until 7:20 p.m. (time of the attack on the police), when I left by bus for Magoula, as always confirmed by those present. .
Around 7:40 p.m. I got off the bus and headed to Magoula Square, where I met a relative and two of his friends. We were there until 21:00. The three people confirm my presence.
All the places mentioned where I was that day are at least 30-35 minute drive from N. Smyrni square, while I have no vehicle or driver’s license.
My involvement in the incident stems solely from the apparently false testimony of my sister’s estranged and mentally unstable husband, who accuses me and my family that my sister and nieces do not want to have any contact with him.
The last time I met him, on Thursday March 4, 2021 with Swan, when he arrived uninvited to our house to cause problems again, I took him out of the house and shortly before he left, among other insults, he told me , among other things, characteristics “… You will see what you will suffer from me …”, “… I will fix you ….”.
The testimony of the false witness is full of gaps and contradictions. Why don’t you give the authorities the full details of the person you were supposed to have made an appointment with that day or even your mobile phone. Is it possible that a professional oil painter, instead of going straight to the prospect’s house, could cost you the paint job, meeting outside a steakhouse?
Does it make common sense to choose to make a business appointment on the specific date in the Nea Smyrni area, when marches and demonstrations have been announced in the specific area?
If you did not know, as you say, about the previously announced marches and demonstrations, why, although your supposedly professional appointment was scheduled for 6:00 p.m., do you mention that you already went to Nea Smyrni at 4:30 p.m.? Perhaps because when he finally gives his testimony, he knows that on March 9, 2021 there was no possibility of access by public transport to Nea Smyrni from 5:00 p.m. onwards?
Due to the chronological sequence of events you describe, our aforementioned meeting must have taken place a few minutes before 7:20 p.m., as it states that immediately after our brief dialogue, I attacked the policeman. Is it consistent with common experience and logic that this dialogue took place between the perpetrator and his ex-boyfriend in front of the protesters and shortly before a massive barbarian attack on the unfortunate police officer?
It is possible that the man who ran – in the crowd – towards the unfortunate police officer could be identified by anyone shortly before the attack, while we all know from the videos that have been made public that the perpetrator had carefully concealed his facial features so how can it not be identified?
How is it possible that he complains that he saw my supposed friend with the nickname “Pontius”, whom he has supposedly seen many times in my house, when for the last four years he does not even know who I am dating?
Why didn’t you report me the same day you supposedly saw me attack the policeman? Why did you have to view the lunch bulletin the next day to identify me and report it to the police, while describing yourself as an eyewitness to the incident?
In his testimony, he states that he allegedly saw me wearing dark tracksuits with a white stripe on the sides and a khaki jacket that had a kind of light print on the back, that is, the clothes that are clearly seen in the videos that the perpetrator is wearing. . exhausting. However, the home search and seizure report shows that police found only “a black tracksuit with three (3) white lines on the sides” in my home.
Why did you mention for the first time in a television interview on March 12, 2021 that you saw me throw the motorcycle of the unfortunate policeman? In fact, in this interview he mentions that his supposedly professional appointment took place at 6:15 p.m., lasted only five minutes and received me immediately, that is, at 6:20 p.m., an hour before the attack on the policeman! Why do you falsely claim that we have no family differences?
Because an unprecedented “fast track” pre-trial proceeding was followed against me, resulting in a period of only SIX (6!) Hours from the false witness testimony, without any substantial evidence against me, that The pre-trial investigation has been “completed”, that I have been arrested, brought before a Prosecutor and an Investigator and my character has been completely “assassinated” by the press? In other words, in six hours I had already become the scapegoat ready for pretrial detention, necessary to appease public opinion.
Why was the mobile phone that I had in my possession at the time of my arrest not confiscated by the Police, despite the fact that from the first moment until today it is in the possession of the Police Authorities as my supposedly personal object, such as a result of which I was deprived of the opportunity to request the lifting of the telephone secret and a SPECIAL order from the Investigator was needed on March 12, 2021 to carry out the seizure?
Because the false witness, while in his statement to the police on March 10, 2021, says: “I saw him running fast, along with other people towards the policemen who were passing with the ducklings, arriving from the first and began to kick a policeman down “and in his television interview on March 12, 2021, he reiterated” did he throw the bike? ” A LITTLE LATER, ON MARCH 12, 2021, IN FRONT OF MR. I DON’T KNOW IF MY KOUNIATES WAS THE ONE WHO DROPPED THE POLICE FROM THE MOTORCYCLE!
