[ad_1]
Panathinaikos – Alba: Dozens especially for points, rebounds, assists, precise triples. An exciting betting experience! | 21+
After a two-month hiatus, due to a coronavirus, the headquarters prosecutor, Charalambos Lakafosis, released his proposal for the 28 defendants in the case of the “Greek Football Band”.
It follows from the procedure that the Olympic and Evangelos Marinakis are not involved in the emancipation of the matches, since there is no transaction between the strongman of the rojiblancos or George Spanos for the match with Atromitos or with Arvanitidis for the match with Veria.
However, the Prosecutor found that an alteration of the result has been achieved in the confrontation of By Veria by Olympic in Karaiskakis of your choice Arvanitidis through Lanari. Dimitropoulos is also proposed as guilty for the Cup match Panacheiki-Olympiakos.
by Vangelis Marinakis and it is proposed that the other seven “Gang” defendants be acquitted, due to a statute of limitations, as she claimed that her action faded in December 2012, early 2013 and therefore there is a time limit statute of limitations as it is a minor offense. This is in addition to his strong man. Olympic to: George Sarris (former EPO president), Theodoros Kouridis, Aristidis Stathopoulos, Giannis Papakonstantinou, Nikos Prountzos (former EPO agents), George Douros (former KED president), Thanasis Briakos (former KED member).
Consequently, Lakafosis proposes:
The accused are innocent:
Vangelis Marinakis, Giorgos Sarris, Thodoros Kouridis, Aristidis Stathopoulos, Giannis Papakonstantinou, Nikos Prountzos, Giorgos Douros, Thanasis Briakos, Spanos, Angelopoulos, Sa Pinto and the arbitrators: Costas Ioannidis, Ioannis Kampas., Ioannis Kampas.
The culprits are:
Dimitropoulos for Panachaiki – Olympiakos and Arvanitidis, Lanaris, Barbas, Pavlidis for Olympiakos – Veria.
THE Lakaphosis he began his speech by saying:
“Deposits Kougia and Alafouzou were captured largely in categories
THE Kougias He appeared in court and largely denied his accusations, saying he had no evidence of match-fixing, that his reference to EPO officials was left to his discretion. The same happened with Alafouzos who said that what he complains about is the result of his own crises watching the games. The board is built on many pillars, one of which is the loan to players. Parliament cites several cases of indebtedness, it should be noted that the loan of players is not a privilege in itself. Olympic. Player loan alone cannot be considered an illegal practice, it is provided“Mr. Lakafosis initially said.
For the parliament that talks about it, the “8” conspired to commit illegal acts from 1/11 to December and the meeting at the Hilton, Lakafosis said:
“They could not have joined a non-existent union of people until December 2011. Yahos, Douros and Briakos were in their sights. Olympic so they have joined the union. At least in May 2012 such consistency I was not between the three and Marinakis».
Mr. Lakafosis at 11 am asked for a break and then he will return to continue announcing his proposal. Upon his return to headquarters, he began to refer separately to matches and categories to referees.
The Prosecutor’s Office also referred to the party Asteras-Olympiacos in Tripoli, saying about the match where the referee was Elias Spathas:
Alafouzos vaguely referred to the struggle with subjective thoughts. I couldn’t find evidence of a rigged match in this particular match. “
“What work did Fyssas have with Olympiakos-Atromitos”
Regarding the match with Atromitos and the fact that Marinakis is alleged to have agreed with Spanos not to use specific players, Lakafosis … empties Fyssas, noting that:
“One of the players that Fyssas says did not play, a change was made. He testified that Napoleon did not play while playing. What the witness stated is unfounded and strangely unfounded. He has such a professional profile that such mistakes are not allowed. From all these incidents, it cannot be said that Atromitos has deliberately weakened in this particular party. It does not describe how Atromitos weakened, nor specific phases. What work does Fyssas have with the experience that he has to face that Atromitos has weakened. The process showed us thatThere were no prior arrangements of the specific matches I mentioned earlier, as well as Marinakis, Spanos, Angelopoulos, for the last match. “
For the Olympiacos-Asteras Cup final, by the hand of Maniatis:
«Indeed, Maniatis’ penalty is unforgettable. The criminal charge that had been initiated for this particular fight was for crime handling. (SS refers to the “shower” in the umpires’ dressing room for which Marinakis was acquitted and in two degrees, the same as Theodoridis). The court said what he said was wrong but it did not affect the referees“Lakafosis said initially and continued:
“The accusation was made after the testimony of Alafouzos, in the known way, we say about any party that we remember. If there was evidence that the 8 had previously agreed with Yahos to arbitrate in the manner he had promised, he would have been prosecuted since then. There are conversations in May 2012 showing that the Marinakis did not appreciate Yahor. If it was the Γιάχος agreed in 2012, no further decommissioning will be attempted. Yahos was not appreciated by Olympiakos“The journalists turned against him at the insistence of Marinakis and Theodoridis.”
“Olympiakos-Veria was altered by the choice of Arvanitidis, did not reach an agreement with Marinaki”
For Olympiacos – Veria in 2013: «Other than the defendant, there are no witness statements, no evidence that a transaction has taken place, no evidence that Marinakis made a deal with Arvanitidis and Lanari to alter the result.
Whether for gambling reasons, it obviously was. The statements of Kalaitzidis, Georgeas, the video, the confirmation of the statements of a defendant, all this, this fight by choice of Arvanitidis and through Lanari, this fight was altered, the result was altered and it is a crime».
In closing, he said: “The Gazoros – Tyrnavos and Konstantineas cases cannot be disputed. There has been continued use of the EPO structure and illegal interventions since January 2012, but it appears that after November 2012 this activity started to decline and then stopped. There has been extensive publicity surrounding the case, an act that has not been linked since December 2012. Therefore, given that all the activity took place as of January 2012, the offenses of 2015 prescribe.».
READ ALSO:
[ad_2]
