[ad_1]
Dimitris Koufontinas’ lawyer, Mrs. Ioanna Kurtovic, issued the following statement:
“State institutions and those who hold public office cannot insult, defame and use their position to distort the truth, silence the media and repress any dissent (typically the battle with the exclusion of a lot of pages and Internet profiles) .
They must not lie in public, sign false statements, mislead the content of legal provisions and confuse citizens, nor, of course, attack a detainee and his lawyer, under the pretext of believing that he is safe in his position. .
The Gen. secretary of crime policy, is lying once again, while the entire state power has been involved in an organized attack with “powders” of preparation (how else does everyone, parliamentarians, vice presidents, prime minister and relatives of the victims appear to be aware of an inmate’s legal actions)? and try to hit the striker, distorting the essence of the causes of his extreme protest.
They call us to go to trial, knowing that this is not possible because the conditions are not met and they made sure that it could not be done.
They are trying to convince that a small local court of first instance can face a decision of the central political power, whose poisonous rhetoric has become the first topic of the news.
They accuse us of delaying the process (!!) without blushing, since, after being excluded from all legal rights and all procedures, they insult a man who suffers the torment of food deprivation for 53 days (and the refusal to drink fluids for many days). ) in the intensive care unit of a hospital.
They mislead the media public that they have full control of what can be considered a “decision” of a central body, a stamp on a form, and even when it is a critical decision about an individual adverse act and that the law requires special reasoning. .
How clear and specific is a reasoning?
-which according to the press releases refers to the conviction for “terrorism” (which, however, does not happen in the case of the forward since he was not convicted of “terrorism” beyond the common criminal provisions, such as the word “terrorism” did not exist in law and justice before 2004),
– while in the body of its own decision (the only one that notified us) it refers to “public order and proper functioning of the business” which, however, is refuted by the prisons, since they confirm that a complaint has never been made against the detainee,
– and when the invocation of the emergency floor of pandemic protection measures is also unjustified, since the transfer was made urgently from a prison without cases, to one with cases, in Cassavetia, which has half of the vacancies (137 people in 270 places) in a crowded prison (700 inmates in 600 places).
An entire government has embarked on a war against a prisoner, and insults him because he goes to the extremes of life, driven by his own vengeful violence, instead of resisting with respect and a sense of responsibility for what he has caused and what he has done. is predicted.
We appealed to the supreme judicial and state institutions and they raised their hands.
“Can the Lamia Court of First Instance have the courage to find a way out of the crisis created by political intransigence?”
