[ad_1]
His statements to open:
“We are all footballers and we all want to see the ball roll on the grass.” We have to … break our heads to find unused solutions. No one can know for sure what the correct steps are.
This whole crisis will test our relationships and our cooperation with the players. The truth is that financially, it is essential that footballers are not harmed and do not lose money. In the reasonable reductions to be made, some are trying to make some commitments that they forgot to pay starting in 2019.
The teams understand the responsibility they have for health and will do all the necessary tests for the players. Because many problems may arise along the way, the State must assume the additional responsibility that corresponds to it, after the opening of sports activities. “
On the situation in Italy and the issue of health: “It is very likely that the health bomb in the area was a football match, Atalanta-Valencia. We all want to play but in some way not jeopardize public health and not risk next season. The point is that unlike Italy, we have to play qualifiers in Europe.
After a two-month absence, players will have to get going, which is risky in itself. We want to enter the field and claim the titles that we claim. That’s why we said that if we can’t get the green light in a reasonable amount of time, we said we can make the decision to stop playing soccer. “
On what can happen in the event of a permanent closure: “If it is declared first, it means that the latter also falls.” There are examples from the Netherlands and France. Let’s not take him to a micropolitical game, which tries to communicate with Olympiacos. Panyonios, for example, should be much more concerned. We hope there will be no interruption. If there is, we will discuss it then. “
On whether players can take the test and if it is negative, stay in hotels: “It’s not easy … Who has rooms with rooms to block players?”
In the case of Olympiacos in the Ethics Committee: “We are dealing with regular judges and independent bodies. We may not have agreed with their decisions, but that does not mean that they are better judging than the appointed committees. They have judicial and legal training that we cannot put aside, for example, with Mrs. Maroupa. It is a process that took place then and one that is taking place now. It is good that football from 2012-2015 reminds us of this. They soften some deposits, they smooth over the years. The best witnesses are us that we were in football then. We saw things that made us laugh, our logic was rushed and people left the stadiums. All cases today, albeit late, are handled by the Ethics Committee. I wish they were all innocent. No one makes it easier for Olympiakos to win, for there not to be a setup game, and for us to go crazy seeing different things.
PAOK FC, because it was in conflict with Olympiacos, without their own initiative, put them in their place and demolished this system. We demolished it and Olympiacos did not forgive us. We will also lift this glove and pursue all your affairs, to the point where it does not go.
I don’t know or care what is happening in Vialand. Mrs Maroupa, Mr Arkoudis, the godfather of Mr Avgenakis, is a committee that has delivered an opinion. We had announced in advance that this case would end at CAS. We hope that CAS will judge. We will see if the Greek authorities do not reach speed and penetration and if some escaped punishment “
He added: “I hope we can talk about more important things. We need to develop a culture of cooperation, which because of Olympiakos we can’t find him Now football will have to face challenges that it has never faced before. I am afraid we will not come out stronger from this crisis and many teams will have a problem. “
[ad_2]
