[ad_1]
Atlético’s vice president, Lásaro Cândido da Cunha, fired at the referee after the defeat of the Alvinegro team against Bahia, this Monday, at the Pituaçu stadium, for the 17th round of the Brazilian Championship. The coach complained of an unmarked penalty on Keno in the first half, when Galo won 1-0.
In a post on Twitter shortly after the game ended, Lásaro acknowledged that the team lost the opportunity to go to halftime winning with more goals, but highlighted that there was an error by referee Anderson Daronco in the play in which the Atlético striker fell. . area later shared with the Bahian defender. In addition, according to the black and white leader, the ruling was “sealed by the VAR.” Finally, Lásaro also requested the departure of the CBF referee, Leonardo Gaciba, stating that “he no longer has the moral capacity to remain in command.”
“We could have scored a lot of goals in the first half (our incompetence). But there was a clear penalty and not strangely marked by the Rio Grande do Sul referee and certified by the VAR. Gaciba, head of CBF arbitration, no longer has the moral capacity to remain in charge of CBF arbitration, ”he published.
During the television broadcast, the referee commentator Sandro Meira Ricci stated that there was contact with the Bahian player in Keno and that in the play he would give a penalty.
We could have scored a lot of goals in the first half (our incompetence). But there was a clear penalty and not strangely marked by the Rio Grande do Sul referee and certified by the VAR. Gaciba, head of the CBF referee, no longer has the moral capacity to remain in charge of the CBF referee.
– Lásaro Cândido (@lasaroccunha) October 20, 2020
The revolt of Lásaro Cândido da Cunha with Leonardo Gaciba is justified after the CBF chief referee admitted last week that the VAR was wrong to annul São Paulo’s goal against Atlético when the match was still 0-0. The match ended with a 3-0 victory for Gallo.
Gaciba said there was an incorrect use of the offside line in Luciano’s shot. “We did an analysis of the offer. The impediment line drawn is not really placed correctly. There are other details that we have in the analysis that we do. There is no point in fighting the image. Clearly, the line is not placed in a standard way.” “It is not a technology error. It is a human error to place the line offside,” said Gaciba, in an interview with the SporTV Selection program.
The president of the CBF arbitration commission added that there was another error in the analysis of the image, since the moment in which there is contact with the ball for the crossing was not captured at the right moment.
“The moment of contact with the ball is not correct. When it comes to coming and going from the first moment of contact with the ball, the image stops a frame before the player’s first contact with the ball. And it could have given a different result in the line of impediment. But it is not a technological error. It is a human error, “he added.
Due to the episode, São Paulo presented a request in the Superior Court of Sports Justice (STJD), this Monday, requesting the annulment of the duel against Atlético.
[ad_2]
