Vasco x Inter: STJD president determines urgent summons from CBF to collect videos and audios of the game | Basque

Otávio Noronha determined the urgent call of the CBF to collect videos and audios of the video referee for the entire match, in addition to opening views to the clubs, CBF and the Sports Justice Prosecutor’s Office.

“Where is the line?”: Look what the managers heard from the VAR of Vasco x Inter in a meeting with Gaciba

Only after receiving the evidence and demonstrations, the president of the STJD will state whether or not the measure requested by Vasco is adequate.

After analyzing the documents and evidence collected by Vasco, Otávio Noronha highlighted the need to agree to the request of the Rio de Janeiro club to determine to CBF the joint recording of the VAR, audios and videos of the entire match from the moments prior to the start of the match. .

+ Vasco enters with request to annul the match against Inter at the STJD

After the meeting, the president of the STJD determined the opening of the hearing for Vasco to demonstrate within two days, in addition to the opening of the hearing so that International and CBF can also raise their voices, if they are interested.

The STJD president also ordered the Prosecutor’s Office to analyze the behavior of the match referee and affirmed that, only after receiving all the requests, will he state whether or not he receives the request to challenge the party requested by Vasco.

See the decision of President Otávio Noronha in its entirety:

“This is a MATCH IMPUGNATION formulated by CR VASCO DA GAMA, with the aim of canceling the game valid for the 36th round of the Brazilian Championship Series A 2020, against the SPORT CLUB INTERNACIONAL.

The historical and peaceful jurisprudence of this STJD is in the sense that only the error of law can serve to support the claim to challenge the Result of the Party, and the principle of pro-competition and informs that this institute should not be popularized, leaving In doubts the result obtained in the field, when there are no minimum grounds to support the claim.

This Presidency, fulfilling the task entrusted to it by the CBJD, has been extremely judicious in the admissibility judgment of this linked reasoning procedure, and that it cannot, in any way, be transformed into a kind of establishment of a “third period ”Of coincidence.

In the present case, CR Vasco da Gama narrates that in the match there was an error of law on the part of the arbitration, which it maintains was an effective cause to alter the result of the dispute, since, at the time, when only 9 were disputed minutes of the game In the first half, there was a goal in favor of the opposing team, SC Internacional, which despite imposing a natural difficulty for the human assessment of the condition of the Player who finished the play, was not reviewed through the VAR , since, it is reported, the technological resource would be momentarily unbalanced.

The Applicant Association adds that it does not intend to discuss questions of fact about the error or the correction of the validation of the play by the Range Officer, in the way it expressly admits it, to recommend the relevant rules for the eventual impossibility to use the VAR. He states that his reason for questioning would be to verify the veracity of the attitudes adopted by the Refereeing Team in light of the rules applicable to the species, from the moment of the operational failure, which, at least in theory, in his opinion, could configure error of law.

Such an assessment, extracted from the Exordial, demands, however, an evidentiary activity that refutes the party’s capacity within the short period of decline of 2 days, which, moreover, was regularly observed by the Claimant.

After all, among other protocol issues that, according to the allegation, were not observed by the Refereeing Team, CR Vasco da Gama questions the attitude of the Central Referee of having, at least apparently, not even questioned about the possibility. prompt repair of the System, or waiting, for a few moments, for the reestablishment of the VAR, which according to what was expressed in a statement from the CeO of the Company responsible for its operation, returned to function in a very short time.

It should be noted that in the Summary of the Match the Referee did not refer to the adversity found in the System and the impossibility of confirming the regularity of the Goal Play, in the way that the pertinent rules impose.

Thus, in fact, the evidence sought by the Claimant becomes relevant, since the Recordings will reveal the dynamics of the event, the communication between those involved and the way in which decisions are made, which can undoubtedly influence the present case.

Here, an important point of distinction from past hypotheses.

This Presidency is always judicious when it comes to verifying whether or not there is a claim qualified for any resistance so that the necessary interest in acting is configured, always requiring the party to demonstrate that before claiming Sports Justice measures, proof that of any way he has tried, administratively, to achieve his goal without achieving success.

It should be noted that CR Vasco da Gama certifies that it has begged the CBF for access to the VAR recordings that it requires here through this channel, but it is reported that, so far, it has not been delivered by the National Authority of Football.

It should be noted that the events narrated in the exordial occurred in the middle of the Carnival, that in the city and in the state of Rio de Janeiro, where the Claimant, the CBF and this Court are based, and where the party Object of This demand was made to maintain the festival, which certainly made access to the material extremely difficult.

The truth is, however, that by means of an incidental petition filed by the Claimant, it was demonstrated that Corinthians obtained access to the VAR recordings in the match in which they faced CR Flamengo, on the same day and time of the dispute between Basque. , now Plaintiff, and SC International.

So, exceptionally, and also, in accordance with the principle of speed, so that the briefest rite of this procedure can be printed, since the Championship is in its final stretch, I have to postpone the incidental claim made, leaving to the analysis of the admissibility of this procedure, until after the meeting of the said claimed evidence.

From the above, it is that (a) I grant the incidental request made, ordering the Secretariat to Official the CBF, so that, as a matter of urgency, it adds to these records the VAR recording, both of the audios and of the video, of the entire period related to the party in question; including the moments before departure and until the end; b) the judgment of admissibility of this procedure is pending for the moment of attaching the evidence and manifestation of the parties.

With the collection of the evidence, give a visit to the Applicant Club, to demonstrate on them, within 2 days.

Mention the International SC and CBF, for wanting, to present their statements, within the legal term, being able, in addition, to want, to also express themselves, on the evidence that will be attached to the records.

Science to D. PGJD, including for science and the adoption of measures deemed appropriate in light of the conduct attributed to the Party Referee, ”wrote Otávio Noronha.