[ad_1]
The Uol published an article on Thursday night (26) in which it assumes that it was wrong to close the time of the PSOL candidate to the city of São Paulo, Guilherme Boulos, without guaranteeing the candidate’s final considerations. The portal and journalist Thaís Oyama were strongly criticized on the networks for using Boulos’s time for a question in the last seconds.
“The PSOL candidate for the City of São Paulo, Guilherme Boulos, did not have time to answer the question of the journalist Thais Oyama at the end of today’s UOL / Folha news due to a mistake made in conducting the interview”, takes over the portal.
There were 45 seconds to go when Thaís Oyama used 38 seconds to ask a final question, leaving Boulos with no time to answer and make his final comments.
Oyama apologized and said that he did not pay attention to the timer. “I was wrong not to have looked at the timer and asked the last question when it was too late. I apologize to the candidate, ”he said.
The website was willing to give the candidate extra time so that he could rethink his reasoning.
In the networks several criticisms arose with comparisons about the different treatment of Saturday with Boulos and with the current mayor Bruno Covas (PSDB).
Among those who complained is the musician Emicida. “This is the level of journalism that will then ask you for support in the name of democracy. Remember that always, ”he wrote on Twitter.
