[ad_1]
The good results of the UFMG are in line with the national trend: of the 6,360 graduations evaluated by the MEC, the federals obtained maximum grades in 342 courses.
Of the 23 higher education courses analyzed by the National Examination of Student Performance (Enade), the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) obtained a maximum score of 19. Scores vary between 1 and 5. The results were published on Tuesday ( 20) by Inep (National Institute for Educational Studies and Research), agency of the Ministry of Education (MEC) responsible for the test.
In the general assessments, 29 areas were included in last year’s test, but the Minas Gerais federal program does not offer all of them in the curriculum. Every three years a different group of courses is analyzed. The good results of the UFMG are in line with the national trend: of the 6,360 graduations evaluated by the MEC, the federal universities obtained maximum marks in 342 courses.
See the UFMG courses evaluated and the qualifications in Enade:
- Veterinary Medicine – 5
- Dentistry – 5
- Medicine – 5
- Agronomy – 5
- Pharmacy – 5
- Architecture and Urbanism – 5
- Nursing – 5
- Speech therapy – 5
- Nutrition – 5
- Physiotherapy – 5
- Biomedicine – 5
- Radiology Technology – 5
- Physical Education (Bacharelado) – 5
- Civil Engineering – 5
- Electrical Engineering – 5
- Mechanical Engineering – 5
- Chemical Engineering – 5
- Production Engineering – 5
- Environmental Engineering – 5
- Livestock – 4
- Control and Automation Engineering – 4
- Forestry Engineering – 4
- Food Engineering – 3
At UFMG, the highest rated course was veterinary medicine, followed by dentistry and medicine. In the areas contemplated, the educational institution did not have a grade lower than 3, with only three subjects – Control and Automation Engineering, Forest Engineering and Zootechnics – with a grade 4. The lowest performance was Food Engineering, which obtained 3 points . .
Public education stands out in Brazil
Most of the courses, 57%, are in grades 3 and 4. Only 2% have a maximum grade and 45% are in the lowest grades. Of the total of evaluated courses, 76% are in private institutions, for profit or not for profit. This reflects the overall ratio of higher education enrollment in private universities and colleges.
The volume of low grades is higher among private courses: 42% have averages 1 and 2. The percentage is equivalent to 2,691 courses, of the total of 6,360 private degrees evaluated. Another 54% obtained grades 3 and 4, in addition to 1% with grade 5 (3% of courses in private universities were not considered).
The results are more positive in public institutions, which generally select the best students with disputed selection processes, such as Enem.
Of the 1,426 courses from federal institutions, 5% had the lowest grades (1 and 2), 70% had 3 and 4, and 24% had the highest grades. In SOEs, 11% had the lowest scores and 16% the highest.
Focusing only on medicine, for example, 3% of private institution graduates (28 out of 132 courses) achieved a maximum score and 19%, the two lowest.
At the other extreme, are the federals, with 29% of the courses with 5 (19 of 66) and 3% in the last two levels.
Since Enade was created to evaluate courses, not students, the grade on this test does not count towards the student’s curriculum.
Enade 2019 evaluated the following degrees: agronomy, architecture and urbanism, biomedicine, physical education, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, speech therapy, medicine, veterinary medicine, nutrition, dentistry, zootechnics and environmental, civil, food, and computer engineering. , control and automation, production, electrical, forestry, mechanical and chemical.
Higher technology courses were also part of this edition: aesthetics and cosmetics, environmental management, hospital management, radiology and safety at work.
Inep launched an indicator that seeks to measure the added value of each course for the development of students.
The IDD (Indicator of the difference between observed and expected performance), which is also part of the federal evaluation system, compares Enade’s results with the Enem of students when they entered the courses.
Of the courses at federal institutions, 6.2% reach the maximum DDI (also on a scale of 1 to 5). This percentage is 4.5% in private for-profit companies.
At the other extreme, 0.8% of federal courses (11 degrees) are at the lowest score in the indicator, while 4.9% of private courses are at this level (164).
These indicators make up the CPC (Preliminary Course Concept), which is the grade for each graduation and also takes into account factors such as the pedagogical organization, infrastructure, and teacher qualification. A low CPC score (below 3) can result in punishment for institutions. (With Folhapress)
[ad_2]
