[ad_1]
I know Bruno Covas I wanted to paste in Guilherme Boulos The brand of the inexperienced could not wait, due to the reactions of the economists, a better gift than the statement of the PSOL candidate in the Status. A day after the economist and columnist for the newspaper Pedro Fernando Nery wrote that the Municipal Pension should receive the attention of voters because it is an invisible threat to the city, Boulos said that holding a contest is a way to raise more for security social and balance the account with inactive.
The declaration unleashed a storm. Nery wrote on Twitter: “It reduces the financial deficit, but greatly increases the city’s spending (the server contributes up to 14%, but this is one-seventh of what the City spends on its salary).” And he added: “The actuarial deficit increases, unless there is a reform (the actuarial deficit increases because, without reform, the new employee will receive benefits in the future).” Alexandre Schwartsman, former director of the Central Bank (2003-2006), during the first Lula government, made a caustic comment. “How come no one thought of it before ?! Genius, genius! If we double the number of employees, we will eliminate the deficit; imagine if we increase ten times … ”Another statement was made by the economist Elena Landau, who retweeted Nery’s article in Estadão. Previously, he joked: “We are going to spend a lot because who knows spending can generate more taxes. He liked it. I’m not from São Paulo, but I would even vote for Boulos just to see how the magic is done ”.
The criticisms led economist Laura Carvalho, who participated in the Boulos economic program in 2018 for the Presidency, to write: “From a strictly short-term accounting perspective, it is true that the deficit in the social security system falls when more people contribute to the system. . But it is clear that this would also translate into higher cost of civil servants’ salaries and future pensions ”. And he concluded: “I am in favor of adjusting these things in the next debate, because it is misleading, but I thought that Guilherme advanced a lot in other economic responses.”
Boulos said that his statement was taken out of context: “I maintain that using the deficit as a justification for not competing does not make accounting sense, since the hired employees would also contribute to the pension fund (…) I do not defend that the balance is realized through new hires. The way I expressed myself may have led me to believe that, which is not my position. “Finally, Professor Thomas Conti, from Insper, said:” Covering social security for servers by hiring more servers is clearly a bomb. of time. “Boulos is now challenged to convince voters that the proposal was” taken out of context “and not a” time bomb. “
[ad_2]
