[ad_1]
In the last five days, another 25 women have contacted lawyers representing 14 other deponents in the Public Prosecutor’s Office against businessman Saul Klein. OR sports confirmed the information with people linked to some of the girls and with the lawyer Gabriela Souza, who works in the process. The income of these women would bring to 39 the total number of people who claim to have been victims of an alleged scheme of grooming, prostitution and sexual abuse.
“Since the publication of the first story, I have been searched for new victims, in a series of more than 20 new reports since 12/23/2020. This search shows that what was happening was not a ‘sugar daddy’ contract, but the abuse of Power that “authorized” the disgusting sexual violence. The claim that the sexual predator is a victim is an affront to the courage of all its survivors and will be annulled in court with the extensive documentation presented so far. “
The defense of the businessman says that there are an equal number of women who came to him to defend him against the charges, and that these testimonies will be taken to the investigation in the future. “This was expected to happen due to the repercussion of the case in the press. There are a similar or greater number of women who have come to us to defend Saúl. We are collecting these testimonies to take them to the investigation in due course.”
Klein defends himself by claiming, through his lawyers, that he was a “sugar daddy”, a term that designates older men who have the fetish of financially supporting younger women in exchange for affection and / or sexual relations, but that there have never been relationships. non-consensual sexual acts. The businessman is the majority shareholder of Ferroviária S / A, a club in the first division of the Paulista Championship. After the complaints, announced his departure from the Soccer Steering Committee of the Araraquara team.
Folha de S. Paulo revealed last Tuesday that 14 women reported the son of the founder of Casas Bahía to the Public Ministry for rape and seduction. Last Thursday, sports published an article detailing the operation of an alleged prostitution, grooming and sexual abuse scheme maintained by the businessman for a decade – the report maintained, for months, contact with women who are not among the 14 who brought the complaint to the MP. The alleged network has reportedly been in operation since 2008, with party events that lasted for days, gathering dozens of girls at Klein’s home in Alphaville and were the scene of abuse.
The courts withhold the businessman’s passport and prevent him from communicating with the 14 female complainants. According to his defense, he hired a company to manage women for his parties and is being “the victim of an elaborate extortion scheme after his hiring ceases.”
“Consensual relationships enshrined in accordance with the rules of the recognized relationship ‘sugar’ were effectively practiced by Mr. Saul Klein. The repetitive frequency of the models, who freely attended Mr. Saul Klein’s events for months or years, constitutes an evident proof of consent of the relationships, which became conflictive exclusively in the fraudulent version made known to the Public Ministry, all due to indisputable patrimonial interests that will surely be brought to light during the course of the police investigation, “says one note sent to the report.
The women informed UOL that they were subjected to weight control, pressured by third parties to perform cosmetic procedures and have sexual relations with Klein, always without using condoms, for a remuneration of R $ 3,000 to R $ 4,000 per week.
The routine was supplemented with a number of special requirements, such as piano lessons, ballet, debates, and even theatrical performances of the movies on the DVDs. The report found that at least two women who attended the Klein residence had health problems and psychological disorders, with access to medical reports and images.
At least three girls signed contracts for R $ 800,000, promising to remain silent. The businessman reported to the court that one of the agreements was closed without his authorization, and he was able to demonstrate, through expert reports, that his signature was false. The others were reportedly signed under threat of disclosure of intimate photos.
