:strip_icc()/s01.video.glbimg.com/x720/9052656.jpg)
[ad_1]
In Fortaleza, referee Wagner do Nascimento Magalhães validated Pablo’s goal after consulting the VAR and allowed the match to restart. Shortly after Ceará put the ball back into dispute, the referee stopped the game and, in a new consultation, annulled São Paulo’s goal.
In the São Paulo evaluation, there was an error in the law there, that is, when the referee does not apply a rule and that can lead to the cancellation of a game. Raí, the club’s soccer executive, said after the game that he collects information to define the tricolor options (watch the video above).
The match between Ceará and São Paulo is confused with VAR – Photo: Caio Rocha / Estadão Content
It was not the first controversy between São Paulo and VAR in this Brazilian. This year’s relationship is in crisis. I remember other cases:
Jo’s punch at Diego Costa
Casão talks about Jô’s punch in Diego Costa
In the classic played in Morumbi, in the first round, the forward Jô, from Corinthians, landed a punch in the back of defender Diego Costa in a dispute in the São Paulo area. São-Paulino rebelled, warned the referee, who, in turn, activated the VAR. The review was done, but nothing was scheduled.
Days later, however, the head of the Refereeing Commission, Leonardo Gaciba, said in an interview with Rádio Bandeirantes, that the referee of the video reviewed the wrong moment of the play. Jô was reported to the STJD (Superior Court of Sports Justice) and suspended by the court.
Goal canceled against Atlético-MG
Gaciba talks about the refereeing error in the Atlético-MG vs São Paulo match: “The line was not placed in the correct place”
The most controversial move in this dispute between São Paulo and VAR was in Mineirão, in a match against Atlético-MG, for the seventh match of the Brazilian.
Still in the first half, Luciano deflected a ball into goal, which ended up being annulled after the VAR pointed out the millimeter impediment of the São Paulo forward. The forward’s position in relation to Atlético-MG’s Junior Alonso raised doubts.
Even that week, São Paulo called CBF to have access to the VAR images and audios, but was not immediately attended to.
The controversy won a new and important chapter more than a month later, when Gaciba admitted to Sportv that the VAR was wrong. According to the president of the Refereeing Committee, there was an error when placing the line that indicates the position of each athlete. The goal was legal and should have been validated.
São Paulo then requested the STJD that the match, which ended with the victory of Atlético-MG, be annulled due to an alleged error of law, but the request was rejected because it was made 48 hours after the presentation of the match. summary.
Validated goal Strength
Goal of Fortaleza! David takes off and plays off Volpi, at 11 ‘in 1Q
São Paulo also complained when he won. By beating Fortaleza 3-2 on matchday 21, the club expressed doubts about the validation of David’s goal, which opened the scoring in the match. The VAR review took about three minutes before the offer was confirmed.
The club had access to the VAR images and, this time, testified that there was no error in the arbitration.
Goal canceled against Ceará
Whistle Central: Sálvio Spínola explains all the controversy that involved the VAR in the match between São Paulo and Ceará
The most recent controversy: According to São Paulo, referee Wagner do Nascimento Magalhães made an error of law by changing a scoreboard after allowing the game to restart.
The play began with a kick from Luan that deflected in the defense of Ceará and reached Pablo, who could not dominate. In the sequence, Luciano kicked, and Pablo, in legal condition, took advantage of the rebound and scored the goal.
+ Analysis: oscillations can take São Paulo out of the title fight
The judge, first of all, annulled the goal with the consent of the flag. Then, in consultation with the VAR, he validated the goal: he made the VAR signal with his hand and pointed to the midfield. Magalhães whistled for the resumption of the match, Ceará touched the ball, but, shortly after, the referee stopped the game again and signaled offside, canceling Pablo’s goal.
+ Read more news from São Paulo
For Globo referee commentator Sálvio Spínola Fagundes Filho, there are reasons for São Paulo to request the cancellation of the match, which ended in a 1-1 draw. The club says it will order VAR images and audios.
