Moro’s Defense asks the STF to appoint a new rapporteur to investigate Bolsonaro’s interference in PF | Politics



[ad_1]

The defense of former Justice Minister Sergio Moro asked, on Tuesday (13), that the Federal Supreme Court (STF) define a new rapporteur for the investigation that investigates whether President Jair Bolsonaro tried to meddle politically with the Federal Police.

The investigation is based on accusations made by Moro and was denounced by Minister Celso de Mello, who retires on Tuesday.

The statute of the STF establishes that, in such cases, the processes can be reassigned to the other ministers or handed over to the successor of the retiree. President Jair Bolsonaro appointed Judge Kassio Nunes Marques to the vacancy, but the Senate has yet to approve the name.

Thus, based on the objective premise derived from the retirement of Hon. Celso de Mello, the present Police Investigation does not have an original Rapporteur to date, which is why, within the permissive rules and at the request of the interested party, In This case, represented by the petitioner, requires the immediate redistribution of the deed in accordance with the aforementioned regulations, ”says the document from Moro’s lawyers.

In the last vote before retiring, Celso de Mello defended President Bolsonaro's personal testimony to the PF

In the last vote before retiring, Celso de Mello defended President Bolsonaro’s personal testimony to the PF

Like Bolsonaro, the former Minister of Justice appears in the investigation as being investigated. The investigation was opened with the approval of the Supreme Court because Moro, upon leaving office, accused the President of the Republic of trying to interfere politically in the command of the Federal Police.

According to Moro, Bolsonaro requested intelligence reports and requested changes in the leadership of the corporation. The President of the Republic denies the charges.

What the STF regiment says

Article 38 of the internal regulations of the STF says that the rapporteur can be replaced, among other hypotheses, by “redistribution, in the terms of article 68”, or by the minister appointed for the vacancy in cases of “retirement, resignation or death” .

Article 68, which regulates the redistribution of the processes, allows this to be done in “habeas corpus, judicial order, claim, extradition, conflicts of jurisdiction and powers, in the face of a serious risk of the expiration of the law or in case of prescription” . of the punitive claim that occurs in the six months following the beginning of the leave, absence or vacancy ”.

The same article also says that the president of the STF can make use of redistribution “exceptionally” in “other facts”, that is, outside the hypotheses listed.

Moro’s defense request is addressed to the president of the STF, Luiz Fux. There is no time limit for him to make a decision.

Celso de Mello’s ‘farewell’

Last Thursday, Celso de Mello voted in a videoconference session of the Supreme Court in favor of Jair Bolsonaro giving testimony in person – and not in writing – in the investigation that is being processed in the Supreme Court. It was the last vote of the minister before retiring.

Celso de Mello had already issued a judicial order (provisional) at the same address, but the Attorney General’s Office (AGU) appealed to request that Bolsonaro be authorized to speak in writing. The topic was then brought to the plenary.

Analysis: the trial for Bolsonaro's testimony

Analysis: the trial for Bolsonaro’s testimony

The other ministers have not yet cast their votes, but Fux has not announced whether the trial will continue in the next session, scheduled for Wednesday (14).

At the end of the session, Fux said that Celso de Mello “built many bridges” and “will always be a beacon” for the members of a court. “A great man is always a bridge, not an end,” he said.

According to Celso de Mello, written testimony is “a true privilege” and those investigated should be treated equally, remembering that Sergio Moro was questioned in person.

“No one, absolutely no one, has the legitimacy to transgress and denigrate the laws and the Constitution of our country. No one, absolutely no one, is above the authority of the Brazilian state legal system, ”said the minister.

For the dean, “the republican postulate repels privileges and does not tolerate discrimination, preventing the establishment of selective treatments in favor of certain people.”

MORO ACCUSATIONS AGAINST BOLSONARO

[ad_2]