Judge defends agglomerations in networks and describes isolation measures as “hysteria”

“A city that has not meekly surrendered to fear, hysteria or depression. Here life goes on. It was wonderful to spend my New Year’s Eve in this environment “, said Judge Ludmila Lins Grilo in a publication that shows a video on a beach in Búzios (RJ) edit

247 – With nearly 200,000 deaths caused by Covid-19, a judge used social media to defend crowds in the pandemic, causing outrage on social media.

Ludmila Lins Grilo, magistrate of the Court of Minas Gerais, Buritis County, shared messages on her Twitter with the hashtag #AglomeraBrasil. With a conservative profile, the judge appears in videos and lives on the channels Tuesday Free, Senso Uncommon and Leda Nagle.

She is an admirer of Olavo de Carvalho, guru of Jair Bolsonaro. “People who have never read his books, in the best ‘I didn’t read and I didn’t like it’ style, are trying to silence their students and admirers so that their ideas don’t circulate,” he wrote on Olavo de Carvalho’s 73rd birthday.

In the post on agglomeration, he also sent a video to his more than 130 thousand followers that shows people walking along Rua das Pedras, in Búzios (RJ), without respecting social distance.

“A city that has not meekly surrendered to fear, hysteria or depression. Here life goes on. It was wonderful to spend my New Year’s Eve in this environment, “he wrote in a message.

The judge, who recently participated in a live with the medical oncologist and immunologist Nise Yamaguchi, who campaigned for the use of chloroquine and also says that she is against mandatory vaccination, supported the speech against vaccination. “The idea that the vaccine is safe and can be imposed by the judiciary is not unanimous, neither among doctors nor among lawyers.”

Reactions

According to a report from the Metrópoles website, lawyer José Belga Assis Trad submitted a request for an investigation of Ludmila Lins Grilo to the National Council of Justice. Trad evaluates that their opinions can influence the followers of the judge.

“By speaking against the recommendations of the health authorities, although he has no training and is not a health doctor, the public that has access to the content of Dr. Ludmila Lins Grilo’s positions begins to confuse the unfounded opinion of the magistrate with that of the magistracy, ”stressed the lawyer, who considers that her messages could constitute a crime of apology for the violation of the preventive sanitary measure (article 268 of the Penal Code).

Knowledge frees. know more