Felipe Neto is prosecuted for corruption of minors by the Rio police; ‘False accusations’, says influencer | Rio de Janeiro



[ad_1]

The Police for the Execution of Police Crimes (DRCI) indicated last Thursday (5) the youtuber and the digital influencer Felipe Neto for child corruption.

The researchers claim that the digital influencer is suspected of posting inappropriate material for children and adolescents on his channel from YouTube. According to the police, Felipe Neto would not have limited the age classification of videos that had “content and language inappropriate for minors.”

The Civil Police of Rio also reported that the case reached the police station after receiving a complaint presented to the Public Ministry of Rio. The prosecutors then requested the investigation of the case and the delegate opted for the prosecution.

For the police, Felipe Neto would have committed crime provided for in article 244B of the Statute of Children and Adolescents (ECA).

Wanted for G1Felipe Neto said, through his team, that he is being attacked with “False accusations and misinformation” made by “members of the extreme right”. The situation would be happening after the influencer made “criticism of the Bolsonaro government.”

Felipe says he was charged without being heard, but delegate denies

Felipe Neto also said that “he provided all the necessary clarifications, but the police chief, without taking any testimony or conducting any investigation, she decided to charge him”.

Despite this, the DRCI delegate, Pablo Sartori, told the G1 what was an option of youtuber not be heard by the police.

“The he’s divulging to everyone that he was charged without being heard and that’s not true. He was summoned, his lawyer came, took a photograph of the process, of all the evidence. But he, through the attorney with power, presented a petition where he clearly said that he did not want to appear to be heard. In the petition he explained the reasons why he had not committed a crime, ”Sartori said.

He was not heard because he chose not to be heard. Although, to my understanding, the evidence in the record was a crime. Reason for which he was charged and the case is pending judgment ”, added the delegate responsible for the accusation.

The digitally influenced person stated that “he remains absolutely convinced and calm that i never committed any crime and reiterates that all this will continue to be analyzed by a prosecutor. ”

[ad_2]