[ad_1]
The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ernesto Araújo, He responded vehemently to the article published in this Friday’s edition of GLOBO and other newspapers by the former president. Fernando Henrique Cardoso and by former ministers Aloysio Nunes,Celso Amorim,Celso Lafer,Francisco Rezek, José Serra,Rubens Ricupero and Hussein Kalout. In the text, the group condemns the Brazilian foreign policy of the Jair Bolsonaro government, declaring that it contradicts the Constitution “in letter and spirit.”
In a reply With an incisive tone full of references to people and with unusual language to the diplomatic medium published at night on a social network, Araújo says that FHC, Ricupero and Amorim are “defenders of hypocrisy”, while the others are called ” minor figures. ” [Eles] “They need to come and learn from us how the Constitution is defended. It is not with globalist cliches. It is not with lies. It is not with nostalgia for an apathetic and corrupt Brazil. It is with faith and love for the Brazilian people, ”he wrote.
The FHC article and the former ministers left aside a decades-long division in Brazilian foreign policy, in favor of a common condemnation of Itamaraty’s current performance. Under Araújo, they say, “Brazilian diplomacy, recognized as a force of moderation and balance at the service of consensus building, has become a complement subordinate to the most aggressive unilateralism.”
Criticizing the current relationship between Brazil and the United States under the Bolsonaro government, the group said that “national independence cannot be reconciled with subordination to a foreign government whose admitted political program is to promote its interest above all other considerations.”
Guga Chacra:The differences between Trump and Bolsonaro in the pandemic
Araújo used the ideas of the ideologist Olavo de Carvalho to respond. In addition to criticizing “globalism”, a concept without academic backing that he considers an international conspiracy to weaken national sovereignty, the minister also attacked the São Paulo Forum, a frequent target of the writer, described as a “network of corruption, dictatorship, drug trafficking and terrorism ”, a description that is not supported by the scientific literature in the area either.
The group also criticized the current conduct of politics with Venezuela, stating that, for ideological reasons, there was a withdrawal from Venezuela, a neighboring country, of all Brazilian diplomatic and consular personnel, leaving our nationals residing there defenseless. “
In response, Araújo said he defends “peace and the peaceful resolution of conflicts.” But the peaceful solution of a conflict must be, in addition to being peaceful, a solution. We do not use this concept as an excuse to walk away. And peace is not only an absence of conflict, it also requires freedom and dignity. “
The chancellor also said that “if they want to implement their failed foreign policy projects again to serve a system of corruption and backwardness, very well. Present this project to people and apply for a choice. Don’t keep using the Constitution as a napkin to wipe your thirst for power out of your mouth. ”
Some authors of the article met in a videoconference in late April, in a debate promoted by the Harvard University Brazil Conference, to discuss the course of current diplomacy.
Speech at the UN
Previously, Araújo spoke at an informal meeting of the United Nations Security Council on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II, and hinted that the Communists are trying to take advantage of the Covid-19 pandemic to “kidnap and pervert” the United Nations, so that the organization serves totalitarian objectives “.
In his speech, the minister declared that, after the victory over Nazism, another form of totalitarianism “tried to manipulate the United Nations in its favor”, implicitly referring to communism. He stated that “unfortunately this ideology is not dead” and that it works “with the same principle of kidnapping and perversion”.
“The COVID pandemic is probably the biggest crisis since World War II. We are not going to allow another form of totalitarianism to emerge now, like the one that emerged after World War II. In fact, a new order will certainly emerge from this crisis, we just don’t know yet what form it will take, ”he said.
The minister also criticized the UN. “If the United Nations ignores today’s real challenges and chooses the politically correct jargon, its role will be diminished. The UN should not be an effort to find a common basis between freedom and totalitarianism, much less to promote totalitarianism surreptitiously. “
[ad_2]
