:strip_icc()/s01.video.glbimg.com/x720/8520900.jpg)
[ad_1]
STF ministers Luís Roberto Barroso and Gilmar Mendes also spoke, with support for Moraes and criticism of Bolsonaro.
In his decision, Moraes pointed to signs of misuse of purpose in the Ramage nomination. The Supreme Minister took into account the complaints made by the former Minister of Justice, Sérgio Moro, who resigned last week alleging that Bolsonaro was trying to politically interfere with the PF.
The interference, according to Moro, Bolsonaro would come precisely with the appointment to the command of the PF of Alexandre Ramagem, who is a personal friend of the president’s children, instead of Maurício Valeixo, appointed by the former minister.
- Moro shows the exchange of messages in which Bolsonaro asks for a change in the PF command
Moraes highlighted Moro’s statements in the decision that Bolsonaro wanted “to have a person from his personal contact” in charge of the PF, “who could call, gather information, collect intelligence reports.”
Celso de Mello authorizes an investigation to investigate Moro’s accusations against Bolsonaro
STF Minister also stated in the decision that Bolsonaro himself confirmed that he would like to receive information from the PF, in the statement that the president made hours after Moro’s resignation.
On Wednesday, after Moraes’ determination, Bolsonaro published a decree that annulled and annulled Ramage’s nomination to the PF and reinstated it to the director general of the Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin).
This morning, when leaving the Alvorada Palace, the president told reporters that the decision of Minister Alexandre de Moraes was “political” and “canetada”. He even countered Ramage’s rejection by the fact that he was friends with his children, claiming that Moraes’ appointment by former President Michel Temer to the Supreme Court was also out of friendship.
“If you can’t be in the FP, you can’t be in Abin either. In my opinion, a political, political decision. And yesterday [quarta] I started the speech by talking about the Constitution. I respect the Constitution and everything has a limit, “said the president.” It does not justify the question of impersonality. How did Mr. Alexandre de Moraes go to the Supreme Court? Friendship with Mr. Michel Temer. Or was it not so? “He added.
Bolsonaro asks Alexandre Moraes of the Supreme Court for coherence
Alexandre de Moraes was Temer’s Minister of Justice, among other positions he held in public life, as security secretary to Geraldo Alckimin, of the PSDB, in addition to being a recognized constitutionalist, with several books published.
Bolsonaro said he had not yet “swallowed” Moraes’ determination because, according to him, “this is not the way to treat” a president. Bolsonaro also said he would appeal the decision.
“I have not yet swallowed that decision of Mr. Alexandre de Moraes. I have not swallowed. That is not the way to treat an executive director who is not charged with corruption, who does everything possible for his country, sacrifices his family, sacrifice friends, sacrifice everyone, “Bolsonaro complained.
See the repercussion of Bolsonaro’s statements on the decision of Alexandre de Moraes:
Fernando Mendes, President of the Association of Federal Judges of Brazil (Ajufe)
“It is important to be clear that the judiciary is one of the powers of the Republic, and it is unacceptable that a public authority does not recognize this fundamental principle or wants to annul this constitutional reality. The Constitution itself establishes the right to free demonstration, but, on the other hand, does not allow the delivery of free crimes, verbal aggressions, or attacks on institutions. It is unacceptable that any magistrate, in the exercise of his constitutional functions to decide on the basis of his free and motivated conviction, is the target of personal attacks. Such attitudes only demonstrate the importance of having an increasingly strong and independent Judicial Power that exercises its function of placing constitutional limits on the performance of any of the powers and their leaders, within the scope of the democratic rule of law. ”
Felipe Santa Cruz, President of the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB)
“The Honorable President of the Republic, who is no longer known for showing signs of appreciation for democracy, for institutions, goes one step further. In other words, we all know that it is up to the Supreme Court to safeguard the Constitution, and it depends of us Brazilians. ” , abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court, file when appropriate our dissatisfaction, appropriate appeals and respect the decisions made by the judiciary. Which is clearly something the president has no evidence to do. And without a doubt, it is another bad example for the Brazilian people, of the ways of reacting in the midst of this pandemic. “
Gilmar Mendes, Minister of the Federal Supreme Court STF
“Judicial decisions can be criticized and are subject to appeal, as a control mechanism. What is not accepted, and turns out to be illegitimate, is the personal censorship of members of the Judiciary. Along with independence, the Constitution enshrines harmony between powers. “
After Bolsonaro’s accusations, Moraes received the support of Minister Luís Roberto Barroso, his colleague on the Supreme Court.
“Minister Alexandre de Moraes arrived at the Supreme Federal Court after a solid academic career and having held relevant public positions, always with competence and integrity. At the Supreme Court, his performance was marked by technical knowledge and independence. We are honored to have you here. ”
