Daniela, from Sta. Catarina, fails again. Even an ambassador is distracted; I do not! – 10/30/2020



[ad_1]

The interim governor of Santa Catarina, Daniela Cristina Purely, needs to be understood better with words. I hope, Clear!, that justice and the rule of law triumph and that the incumbent, Carlos Moisés, return to power. Exceptions procedures must end in the country. But let’s get to the point.

We have already seen that Daniela Cristina, on the day of her strange interim mandate – in which she spoke as eternal -, refused to make an explicit condemnation of Nazism and Jewish Holocaust deniers. The question was asked by a reporter from The Intercept Brasil website.

After all, she had referred to the family in her expendable speech at the head of the interim, and her father, Altair Reinehr, is a well-known revisionist of history in favor of Nazism.

I wrote about it. Jewish entities have demonstrated. Pressed, the governor decided to issue the following note:

“First of all it is necessary to declare that I am against Nazism, just as I am against any regime, system, conduct or position that threatens individual rights, security guarantees or against people’s lives, and I honestly thought that I left this became clear when I was questioned during a press conference on Tuesday (10/27), regardless of the words used.

I can understand the reaction of the people to the charge that they accused me, and mainly because it happened unfairly, from an unethical attitude, who presented an edited video, with an altered question.

I am a friend of Israel and the Jews, and any statement to the contrary does not correspond to the truth. “

CALM THERE!
Well, I am compelled to say that the antithetical is the letter from the interim who spoke as a usurper. Here is the video with the question and the answer, without any interference. Then, I transcribe the content of both once.

TRANSCRIPTION
TIB: – At the beginning of your speech, you thanked your family. And his father, as a history teacher, preached Jewish Holocaust denialism in the classroom, including using books from a publishing house that was convicted of telling lies about World War II. And, now that you are Governor of Santa Catarina, we want to know: what is your position? Do you corroborate these neo-Nazi Holocaust denier ideas?

DANIELA CRISTINA: I hope, from now on, and throughout history, to be judged for my actions, my convictions and the attitude that I have always had in everything I have done. I can’t really answer, be judged or condemned for what he thinks this or that (sic). I respect people, regardless of their way of thinking, I respect individual rights and freedoms. And any regime that goes against what I believe, against those elements that I said, I repudiate it. There is a relationship and a conviction that moves me, and I believe it to all of you, to what you call ‘family’. And it is up to me, as a daughter, to keep the family relationship in harmony, regardless of differences of thought, regardless of defenses (sic). I am a person who, like you, has problems, who has differences in his family environment, who suffers, who cries, who smiles, who vibrates, but who tries to do his best to fulfill the mission that the vow of Santa confers on me Catarina. I really hope that they judge me again, that the acts are separated, as it was in the Mixed Commission. I don’t want to get carried away by the actions of others, by the beliefs of others. My convictions have been very clear on social media for a long time. In fact, there is very little of me, of my particular, but there is a lot of my thinking, of my activism, and I really ask that the acts be separated and that I be judged and evaluated for what I do, not for the acts of third parties.

It turns out that Daniela Cristina needs to pay more attention to words: when she speaks, when she answers sensitive questions, and when she decides to make accusations.

AMBASSADOR
Ambassador of Israel in Brazil, Yossi Shelley, a Bolsonaro enthusiast like Daniela Cristina, wrote an open letter to the governor saying that he is now satisfied with the response. There it is written:

“I am pleased with his response, but I hope that his retraction through fair pressure from the Jewish community, from now on, remains a commitment to historical truth.”

“Denying the holocaust is disrespectful not only to the Jewish people, but to all other victims of this regime. Silence will never be a comfort to the victims and it will never be a condemnation for the Nazis.”

Well, I’m less satisfied than he is for two reasons.

First, because of the lie told: there was no edition that distorted the governor’s speech.

Second, due to a rigor that the ambassador lacked, but which I learned from many Jewish scholars who preceded him.

You have to be careful when someone says “against Nazism and any regime that … etc.” There is a subtle mental operation there, which can escape the ambassador, which makes Nazism one example, among many, of dictatorial regimes.

Nazism must not lose its particularity. It was not just tyranny. It was a tyranny that killed Jews for being Jews, gypsies for gypsies, homosexuals for being homosexual …

We try to eliminate a town because that town is who it is.

Obviously, I dare not teach a Jew to be a Jew. But I can, yes, teach a little history to those who need it.

I hope you speak little. After all, that place belongs to Moses.

[ad_2]