[ad_1]
Playback / YouTube / Jair Bolsonaro
To once again defend the appointment of Kassio Marques in the STF, Jair Bolsonaro came to criticize the eventual ineligibility of Dilma Rousseff after the impeachment trial.
In today’s live show, he tried to explain, erroneously, the mandate of the minister that made the Law to Clean the Registry more flexible. And then I said it would be “an absurdity“The ineligibility of the PT after its removal from the Senate in 2016.
“When Dilma was charged, back in the Federal Senate, to the Supreme Minister who led the impeachment process there, she was charged and was no longer eligible. This is absurd what happened ”, Bolsonaro said.
Dilma, in fact, was not even ineligible after the impeachment. Despite having her mandate revoked, senators released her from the ban on running for office, so much so that she ran (and lost) the race for a Senate seat in 2018.
On the 19th, Kassio reduced the period of ineligibility of politicians sentenced by collegiate bodies (second instance or higher courts). He suspended the section of the Clean Registry that counted the term of 8 years only after the sentence was served.
In cases of conviction for a crime of responsibility, such as impeachment, disqualification from public functions, for 8 years, is provided for in the Constitution since 1988. The Clean Registry only extended this type of sanction to convictions for common crimes and illegal acts.
To defend Kassio, Bolsonaro confused everything. Before talking about Dilma, he said “lie” that the minister defaced the Clean Registry.
“Candidate for councilman, man and you will go how easy it is. Run for mayor and see what it’s like to face administrative misconduct. You do not know what it is? That’s it. Any business adapts to you “, declared live.
“I can’t fix everything, I accept criticism, without any problem. But she is critical as well as critical, and many times she doesn’t know what is happening. For example, right, they criticize Kassio. Where did it go wrong? ‘Ah, it defaced the Clean Record Act.’ Lie! What he did was define the period after which he begins to count the 8 years of ineligibility, nothing more than that “he said then.
“What he did, in my opinion, because he did not speak to me or is going to speak, is an autonomous person – you cannot begin to answer a case, today he is sentenced in the first instance, in 10 or 15 years he is sentenced in the second instance , and since then he has been ineligible for 8 years, it is a double punishment for him “he continued.
More news
[ad_2]
