[ad_1]
OR sports He tried to contact Tereza’s family, who did not want to speak outside the file. The commentator sent a statement to the report saying he was not “holy”, acknowledging that their relationship was not healthy and pressing charges – and the records of the case against Tereza – after crossing out her case and alleging that an unauthorized card was used.
See Alê’s position in its entirety:
“It is known that, this week, events appeared on the networks that exposed me and my family, containing partial information about my divorce.
I’m not a saint, as there are no saints in the relationship I had, and that fell apart.
The end of my marriage made me show that my relationship was not healthy, but clearly there were excesses on both sides.
Police reports should look like what they are: interested unilateral reports. And, at that moment, there are those bulletins that were launched against me so much that they never got ahead, just as there are others that I have registered against my ex-wife.
I say that there was never physical aggression or threat of it, but always mutual verbal attacks, almost always due to financial problems and jealousy.
The leaked partial audios were decontextualized of when and how they were spoken, in a cowardly attempt to suggest physical attacks and / or threats. In one of them, when at the beginning of the separation process I said that I would separate the current accounts of the then couple, I used the term “bleed” (a term common to any merchant that refers to the unscheduled withdrawal of cash from the bank). The discussion was, as always, financial and the interpretation given is a factoid.
Taken out of context, posting on social media was a studied maneuver and quite malicious to suggest a reality that never existed. It is an attitude of despair in the heat of an ongoing legal dispute.
My car was recently scratched (with images that prove the fact and by registration with the police authority); purchases were made unused using the security mechanisms of my credit card (which has already been the subject of a police search and will have consequences); they sent me audios of threats; but that is a matter that must be handed over to the courts.
Since I took the initiative to divorce, I began to be attacked in all ways, but what really turned me on was the maneuver to get away from my daughter. Using a teenager as a bargaining chip is absolutely damning.
So my outburst. The patrimonial issue should not interfere in the father x daughter relationship. Once again I make it clear: absolutely all the complaints of aggression that they had made never suggest physical violence, but ALLEGATIONS of verbal offenses – which have always been MUTUAL. The only element that could suggest this was taken from a context of discussion about personal expenses and finances. It is cowardice and a speech that “plays” for social networks.
All complaints have not been converted into any process, except the one recently carried out, which is ongoing and will be dealt with.
Social networks are repeating a couple fight that occurs as a result of the divorce and the discussion about custody and visitation with my daughter. I am in deconstruction and I committed some excesses, even due to the circumstances of this end of the relationship that I summarize above.
I send for publication, with this note, innumerable images of publications made by my ex-wife taking me as an example of husband, father and stepfather, taken from the happy moments that we live. Moments when, at one point or another, we had disagreements and police reports and mishaps, taken from exalted spirits.
I vent again: I miss my daughter and I will never stop fighting all the forces that try (and manage) to drive her away. “
