[ad_1]
Fundamental bands for the history of rock, the Beatles and the Rolling Stones carry one of the oldest rivalries in music. Formed in England during the 1960s, the groups have always been the subject of comparisons by fans and critics. The most recent episode of this richa began in April, during the participation of the Beatles. Paul MCCARTNEY in the program The Howard Stern Show. When the presenter Howard Stern hinted that he preferred the Liverpool quartet, Macca agreed to say that “There are many differences, and I love the Stones, but I’m with you. The Beatles were better”.
Last week it was time for Mick jagger, lead singer of the Stones, responds to the provocation. In an interview with Beats 1, the musician learned of the presenter’s controversy. Zane Lowe. After bursting out laughing and saying that “Obviously there is no competition”, explained the great difference between the bands:
“Rolling Stones has been a great band for many decades and in other areas, when the Beatles didn’t even tour in arenas, [ou shows no] Madison Square Garden with a decent sound system. They broke up before this started, the tour for real. “
Finally, Jagger revealed that the real difference between the groups is the fact that one still exists:
“We started doing stadium shows in the 1970s and we are still doing it now. That is the real big difference between these two bands. One is incredibly fortunate to play in stadiums and the other no longer exists. ”
Both Paul McCartney and the Rolling Stones participated in the presentation. One world: together at home last saturday (18) – look how it went. Mick Jagger’s group also revealed the unprecedented. “Living in a ghost town” Listen here.
[ad_2]
