[ad_1]
The Federal Supreme Court (STF) has endorsed that governments can establish measures for the mandatory vaccination of the population against covid-19. According to the understanding, the Union, the states, the Federal District and the municipalities can establish legal measures in a compulsory way, but cannot determine forced vaccination. 
But the decision still generates controversy, in part due to a lack of knowledge about what this mandatory obligation would actually be.
First, the STF states that No law can provide that the citizen be taken by force to receive the vaccine..
► The obligation is to restrict rights due to lack of proof of vaccination; In other words, each state can adopt bans and vetoes for those who do not get vaccinated. See some of them:
- Stop receiving a social benefit
- Being prohibited from entering any place
- You will be prevented from enrolling in the public school system.
► Parents or guardians of children and adolescents should also vaccinate their children.
► According to the STF, compulsory vaccination (compulsory0 of the population, under penalty of mayors and governors) is compulsory by the Government.
Why mandatory? STF explains
According to the STF minister, by making vaccination compulsory, respect for freedom of conscience and beliefs is not being disregarded, but the rights of the community must prevail, considering that an unvaccinated person can put others at risk of contamination .
In a poll, which you can answer below, TNH1 is listening to the Internet user on the subject. Check out:
