:strip_icc()/s03.video.glbimg.com/x720/9052610.jpg)
[ad_1]
Goal of São Paulo. Cancelled. Validated. The referee signals the center of the field, the Ceará player touches the ball. The referee stops, reviews the play that he had already reviewed. Cancel the goal.
All these actions, in the second half of the match between Ceará and São Paulo, this Wednesday, in Castelão, may give rise to doubts about the final result of the match. The game was tied 1 to 1 when Pablo took advantage of a rebound and scored the goal.
On the play, Luan hits from outside the area, the ball deflects into an athlete from Ceará and hits Pablo, who is offside. The game continues, Luciano kicks, Pablo, this time in legal position, catches the rebound and hits the goal.
Wagner do Nascimento Magalhães whistled the match in Castelão – Photo: Caio Rocha / Estadão Content
See more:
+ Actions: scores of São Paulo players
Arbitration is canceled first. Then, before Ceará replaces the ball, referee Wagner do Nascimento Magalhães makes the revision signal at the VAR and confirms the goal. There is a complaint from the home team, but one of the players even touches the ball in the middle of the field to restart the game, after the referee has authorized it.
Ceará and São Paulo drew in Castelão – Photo: Kid Júnior / SVM
Magellan, however, whistles and stops the game again. Now, to annul the goal, due to Pablo’s impediment, in the first play.
According to Globo referee commentator Sálvio Spínola Fagundes Filho, the offer was canceled as it should have been. The problem, however, occurred in the Magalhães shares. Before definitively canceling the play, he scores the goal and authorizes the resumption of the game. Y
By stopping again and changing the score again, you would have broken the rule that says a decision can no longer be changed after restarting the game. Please understand in the video above.
– Once the game is restarted, you cannot back down on a technical decision. From the image, it was still under review. That must be evaluated: if he authorized it or not (the restart of the match) – said Sálvio.
+ Read more news from São Paulo
This error, in the interpretation of the commentator, may be reason for requesting the annulment of the game, since it was an application error in the rule.
– This game will have a third time, on the court, – said Sálvio, in the transmission.
São Paulo already tried to cancel a match in this Brazilian, against Atlético-MG, from the first round, but had the request denied by the STJD (Superior Court of Sports Justice) for having made the request after the deadline.
The offer in Ceará generated a revolt in São Paulo.
– The complaint is that the judge authorized the exit, validating the goal, then came back out of nowhere. The VAR scored the goal and then went looking for something else. I’m sure our board will talk to CBF, it’s possible to cancel the game. You have to check it out. He scored the goal and then came back, he had never seen it – said the winger Reinaldo.
