[ad_1]
Despite the rain of criticism of the idea of holding a referendum on the convocation of a Constituent Assembly of Brazil, the leader of the government in the Chamber, Deputy Ricardo Barros (PP-PR) considers that the return was positive. “The impact was good,” Barros told the column.
He was not affected by the dissenting comments of the mayor, deputy Rodrigo Maia (DEM-RJ), the TCU minister, Bruno Dantas, and the former minister of the Supreme Court, Carlos Ayres Britto. “I received several supports from those who would not be reached with the end of the privileges,” says the government leader.
He declined to reveal the names of these followers. “If they want to go public, let them do it,” he said.
One of the harshest criticisms was made by another former STF minister, Carlos Velloso, who told Jornal Nacional on TV Globo that such a referendum would amount to a coup. Barros, however, asks: “Can a plebiscite be a coup?”
“I said ‘I personally defend a plebiscite’, I did not speak for the government and I left it to the popular decision. What is the reason for this reaction? ”, The deputy wants to know.
The main objective of Barros’ speech, for whom the 1988 Constitution granted many rights but imposed few duties, was the Judiciary. Condemns the actions of some members of the Justice. “The reaction of the robed to my speech was disproportionate. I just want the balance between the powers, ”says Barros.
