[ad_1]
Planalto Palace
On Friday afternoon (10/23), the head of the Institutional Security Office, General Augusto Heleno, released a note indicating that the information transmitted to the GSI on alleged “irregularities in the information contained in the Tax Investigation Reports “prepared by federal agencies on Senator Flávio Bolsonaro (Republicans-RJ) were obtained” informally “with the lawyers of the son of the President of the Republic.
The meeting with the head of the GSI and lawyers for Jair Bolsonaro’s son was revealed by journalist Guilherme Amado, of the magazine. Timeand confirmed by lawyers Luciana Pires, Juliana Bierrenbach me Rodrigo Roca. Also attending the meeting were President Jair Bolsonaro and Alexandre Ramagem, director of the Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin). The agreement was not registered in the official agendas of Bolsonaro and Augusto Heleno.
According to the note published by the head of the GSI, the government agency did not take any action and understood that “it was not their place to do anything” about the case.which, according to the text, has been investigated by the Internal Revenue Service. Read the full note below:
“GSI informally drew attention, through attorneys Luciana Pires and Juliana Bierrenbach, to information on alleged irregularities, which were allegedly committed in IRS reports.
According to the aforementioned lawyers, these complaints were taken to the GSI, in theory, to reach a member of the presidential family.
However, in light of what was presented to us, what might seem a matter of institutional security, was configured as a subject, dealt with within the scope of the Internal Revenue Service, of an internal nature of that body and already prosecuted.
In light of this, GSI did not take any action. It understood that, within its legal powers, it was not responsible for any action on the matter. “
In addition to the note, Augusto Heleno also attacked journalists on his official profile on social networks. “I will not refute Miriam Leitão’s unfounded accusations. Today she is obsessed with speaking ill of the Bolsonaro government and distilling her hatred for the military. I speak to the Brazilians forever. There are no spies, spies or secret agents in Abin. There are intelligence professionals Tendered, prepared and capable, as is their duty, to FOLLOW (sic) the events that interest our country, as do all the intelligence agencies in the world. We do not monitor people, nor do we patrol institutions, nor do we monitor anyone. Simple as that, ”he argued.
The defense of Flávio Bolsonaro also issued a note. Read below:
The defense of Senator Bolsonaro clarifies that the suspicions of irregularities in the information contained in the Tax Investigation Reports prepared in his name drew the attention of the GSI, since they differed greatly from the characteristics, content and form of the same Reports prepared . other cases, also pointing out that previous reports from the same body did not indicate any indication of atypical activity on the part of the Senator. Finally, it should be noted that the incident was taken directly to the GSI because it was carried out against a relative of the President of the Republic. “
Pregnancy CPI
Despite the explanations, members of the opposition in Congress are already working to establish an IPC. Parliamentarians want to see if President Jair Bolsonaro used the state’s intelligence structure to protect his children. If proven, it would constitute a crime of liability.
“It is an attack on the Constitution and the laws of the country that the President of the Republic uses his public office and intelligence institutions to try to free his son from a criminal investigation carried out by the Public Ministry. It is not a question of family security, but rather of shielding against the application of the law, ”said Congressman Alessandro Molon (PSB-RJ), who has already begun to collect signatures for the establishment of a CPI to investigate the case.
Senator Randolfe Rodrigues (Rede-AP) stated that he will present a writ of mandamus to the Federal Supreme Court for the removal of Heleno and Ramage.
[ad_2]
