[ad_1]
At Central do Apito, the commentator Sálvio Spinola observed the play and had the feeling that the São Paulo forward was not hampered. The VAR marked the annulment of the goal considering that Luciano was ahead of the last goal scorer of Atlético.
– That is the great controversy. Too late. At the moment of the pass there is the story of the painting, Luciano, Igor Rabello. A very controversial move. For me, looking at this image, using computer graphics, I have a complete sense of the same line. It is difficult to characterize the red line and the blue line.
– Ideally, CBF would transmit the audio, the reversed camera, if perhaps Luciano’s knee was considered a reference. But the information from Mineirão is that the line was made on Luciano’s shoulder. Being shoulder, with this image, the sensation is of the same line – Sálvio affirmed, in “Troca de Passes”, of SporTV.
The VAR cancels São Paulo’s goal against Atlético-MG – Photo: Playback
The commenter also stated that greater clarity is needed in the disclosure of the information the VAR uses to make decisions.
– The discussion is in the execution of this infographic. The arm is not taken into account, what was taken was the shoulder. Looking at Luciano’s red dashed line, we see it starting from his shoulder. He was in a not as inclined position as Igor Rabello. You cannot mark it as a success or a failure. Needs more clarification, more infographics, cockpit audio, what the umpires said in executing that.
With the defeat, São Paulo was left with 13 points, still in the vice-direction of the Brazilian Championship, three behind the international leader.