Roger was a victim of “modernity” – Menon’s Blog



[ad_1]

Quincas Berro D’água, an incorrigible bohemian, missed a bottle. They weren’t drops. It was water. When he realized it, he cried out desperately: Aaaaaa And he died. Jorge Amado, great!

Roger Machado is not about Quincas. He did not fall in love with changing his style. It fell for consistency.

Bahía lost to Flamengo, at home, by 5 x 3. Losing would be normal, outside the curve is an eight-goal game. And make life easier for the rival. Roger fell.

He fell clinging to his convictions. You must be proud of consistency. Or he has made a living and can give his rival many opportunities.

Bahia is a very nice rival there. Tremendous rival. Strong rival. And he gave away a goal after two minutes.

I like it? With the ball out of defense. The goalkeeper will give everything a goal. Give the defender a side touch. He returns the ball with more force than necessary and Pedro scores.

Why? For what? In the name of belief in supported play? Since kicking is forbidden, why not give a vertical pass behind the wheel?

Should the game model be like this?

Still with conviction.

Bahía faced Flamengo as if Flamengo were Bahía. He decided to play as equals, as if they were the same. As if they had the same technical quality. As if he had the same touch of the ball.

And he only committed eight fouls in the game. Eight. Well, against Flamengo you have to be combative. You have to be competitive. You need to tap the game. Prevent the stars from playing.

Roger looked good.

He fell because he only sees football in one way.

This is a limitation.

[ad_2]