[ad_1]
Brasilia – President Jair Bolsonaro mentioned his intention to interfere with the “PF” (referring to the Federal Police) during the ministerial meeting that took place on April 22 at the Planalto Palace. This is what the Attorney General’s Office (AGU) reported, in a statement sent Thursday night to the Federal Supreme Court (STF). The statement contradicts Bolsonaro, who told the press that he did not mention the family or the FP at the meeting.
“I tried to officially change the people from our security in Rio de Janeiro and I couldn’t do it. This ended. I’m not going to wait for … all my dirty family, or my friend, because I can’t change someone from security in the end of the line that belongs to the structure. It is going to change; if it cannot change, its boss changes; it cannot change the boss, the Minister changes. And that is the end. We are not here to play, “said the president in that moment, according to the AGU transcript.
Former minister Sérgio Moro stated in a statement that the meeting exposes the attempt of the President of the Republic to interfere in the FP, which is being investigated in the investigation.
The demo contains a transcript of excerpts from Bolsonaro’s speech at the meeting. According to reports from people who saw the video of the meeting, the president described the PF superintendency in Rio as “security in Rio.” Bolsonaro affirms, on the other hand, that he was referring to his personal security, which is carried out by the Office of Institutional Security (GSI), and not by the PF.
Interference
Bolsonaro told aides at the ministerial meeting that he cannot be “surprised by the news.” “Wow, I have the PF that does not give me information; I have the intelligence of the Armed Forces that do not have information; ABIN has its problems, it has some information, it simply does not have more because it is really lacking … we have problems … rigging etc. We cannot live without information, “he said.
“So this is the concern we have to have: the strategic question. And we are not having it. And I am sorry for our information service, everyone, it is a pity, a pity, I am not informed, and you cannot work like this It is difficult. Then I will interfere. Period. It is not a threat, it is not an extrapolation on my part. It is true, “he said.
Sérgio Moro’s lawyers said they were “surprised” by the AGU statement. For them, the partial transcript reveals “disparity of arms”, since it shows that the AGU has access to the video and the defense does not. Furthermore, according to the defense, it does not contextualize relevant passages for a proper understanding, as in the ‘RJ security’ part. “Even the literal passage, compared to subsequent events – resignation of the PF CEO, replacement of the PF superintendent and removal of the MJSP – confirms that the references referred to the PF and not the GSI,” say the attorneys, who request dissemination of the video in its full content.
[ad_2]
