[ad_1]
BRASÍLIA – At the meeting held at the Planalto Palace on April 22, cited by former Minister Sergio Moro as evidence that Jair Bolsonaro tried to interfere in the activities of the Federal Police, the president complained about the lack of information obtained by the PF. Then he announced that he would interfere, without saying how he would do it. The transcribed excerpt from the video was released by the Attorney General’s Office (AGU) to the Federal Supreme Court (STF) on Thursday. The AGU requested on Thursday to publish only excerpts from the video with Bolsonaro’s lines.
Understand: The contradictions of the testimonies on the ministerial meeting of the 22
“The news cannot surprise me. Oops, I have the FP that does not give me information; I have the intelligence of the Armed Forces that have no information, ABIN has its problems, it has some information, it simply does not have more because it is really lacking … we have problems … rigging, etc. We cannot live without information. Who has never been behind … the … the … door listening to what their son or daughter says? You have to see him later … after she gets pregnant, don’t talk to her anymore. You have to see it first. After the boy filled his horns with drugs, there is no use talking to him: it’s over. And the information is like that, ”Bolsonaro said at the meeting.
Then a comment is made about “friendly nations,” which AGU does not transcribe. Bolsonaro adds: “So this is the concern we must have: the strategic question. And we are not having it. And, sorry, our information service, everyone, is a shame, a shame, which I am not informed about, and it is not possible to work like this, it is difficult. Then I will interfere. Final point. It is not a threat. It is not extrapolation on my part. It is true ”, he concluded.
According to AGU, the two excerpts transcribed at the meeting “are not in the same context, but quite the opposite: they are temporarily and radically distant in the chronological sequence of the meeting.” Therefore, it could not be concluded that the interference would be related to the FP, in the interpretation of the Union Attorney General, José Levi Mello do Amaral Junior. Also according to the agency, Bolsonaro did not express his dissatisfaction with PF’s intelligence reports. The president would have shown dissatisfaction “in a completely different context, in an exemplary, strictly generic way.”
But two days after the meeting, Bolsonaro fired PF CEO Maurício Valeixo, a move that triggered Moro’s resignation and allegations. Then, in early May, the new director general, Rolando de Souza, announced the change of the superintendent of the Federal Police in Rio de Janeiro: Carlos Henrique Oliveira was invited to be the executive director of the institution in Brasilia, leaving in his place the delegate Tácio Muzzi.
Understand: Investigations in the Supreme Court and Congress concerning Bolsonaro
In another excerpt delivered by AGU, Bolsonaro said he wanted to change “our security” in Rio. “I tried to change the people from our security in Rio de Janeiro officially and I couldn’t. It is over. I will not wait for all my horny family, or my friend, because I cannot change someone from security at the end of the line that belongs to the structure. It will change, if you can’t change, change your boss, you can’t change the boss, change the minister. And that’s it. We’re not here to play, “he said.
AGU says in the petition that the term “our security” referred to presidential security, under the responsibility of the Office of Institutional Security, and not of the Federal Police. However, sources who viewed the video say that the context of the prayer is in the context of the investigations and that the reference to the “change of minister” was clearly Moro. In addition, by law, the responsibility for the security of the president’s family does not lie with the Federal Police, but with the Office of Institutional Security (GSI), headed by Augusto Heleno.
Moro defends the dissemination of the video
In a statement, Sergio Moro’s defense stated that the Office of the Attorney General’s use of verbatim excerpts from the meeting reinforces the need for the video to be published in its entirety.
“The partial transcript reveals a disparity in weapons, as it shows that the AGU has access to the video, while Sergio Moro’s defense does not. The petition contains verbatim transcripts of extracts from the President’s statements, but with omission of the context and relevant excerpts for a proper understanding of what happened at the meeting, included in the “RJ security” section of the immediately preceding section. In any case, even the literal section, compared to subsequent events, such as the director’s dismissal General of PF, the replacement of the Superintendent of PF and the removal of the Minister of Justice confirm that the references concern the PF and not the GSI. The partial transcript only seeks to reinforce the thesis of the President’s defense, but reinforces the urgent need to publish the video in its entirety. ” , the lawyer Rodrigo Ríos said in a note.
