:strip_icc()/i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_59edd422c0c84a879bd37670ae4f538a/internal_photos/bs/2018/L/i/uAYBh7Qu29T5JooBLZ3A/suspeito-bolsonaro-ok.png)
[ad_1]
The Federal Police (PF) concluded in a second investigation that There were no directors for the knife attack against Jair Bolsonaro in Juiz de Fora (MG) during his presidential campaign for PSL in 2018.
According to the investigation, coordinated by the delegate Rodrigo Morais and delivered this Wednesday (13) to the Federal Court in Juiz de Fora, the author of the stab, Adélio Bispo de Oliveira, acted alone, on his own initiative and without the help of third parties., having been responsible for both the planning of the criminal action and its execution.
“What the investigation showed was that the author, in an unprecedented way, attacked the life of a then candidate for the Presidency of the Republic, with the clear purpose of taking his life,” highlights the delegate in the investigation.
Even according to the investigations, the participation of party associations, criminal factions, terrorist groups or even paramilitaries in any of the phases of the crime (reflection, preparation and execution) has not been proven.
Excerpt from the conclusion of PF’s second investigation into the Bolsonaro attack. – Photo: Playback
Excerpt from the conclusion of PF’s second investigation into the Bolsonaro attack. – Photo: Playback
The first investigation of the case had been completed in September of the same year. The initial investigation had already considered that Adélio Bispo acted only at the time of the attack and that the motivation would have been “undoubtedly political”. He was later charged with committing a personal attack for political non-compliance, a crime under the National Security Law. (See video below)
The second evaluation was carried out to ensure that there was no participation of third parties, with the participation of an eventual client, a hypothesis that ended up being discarded.
PF says Bolsonaro’s aggressor acted only at the time of the crime and for political reasons
Details of the second survey
The second investigation thoroughly investigated all material seized from Adélio Bispo, such as a laptop, cell phones, and documents. Two terabytes of image files, 350 hours of video, 600 documents and 700 gigabytes of multimedia data volume were analyzed, in addition to 1,200 photos.
In total, 23 expert reports were prepared, 102 people interviewed in the field and 89 witnesses heard in the investigation. Search and seizure procedures, tax violations, bank and telephone secrets were also carried out.
According to the PF, Adélio’s laptop was an obsolete model, valued at R $ 699.00. – Photo: Federal Police / Disclosure
According to the PF, Adélio’s laptop was an obsolete model, valued at R $ 699.00. – Photo: Federal Police / Disclosure
During the investigation, the Federal Police analyzed more than 40 thousand emails received and sent in accounts registered by Adélio Bispo. Technicians of the corporation also examined videos and theories about the alleged help received by Adélio at the time of the attack, broadcast on social networks. None of these steps indicated relevant information.
Bolsonaro was stabbed during a campaign in Juiz de Fora – Photo: Playback / TV Globo
Bolsonaro was stabbed during a campaign in Juiz de Fora – Photo: Playback / TV Globo
The only pending diligence in the investigation carried out by the Federal Police remains in the analysis of the content of the cell phone of the lawyer Zanone Manoel de Oliveira Júnior, who provided Adélio’s defense from the day after the stabbing.
Zanone Junior, one of the lawyers accused of stabbing Jair Bolsonaro, also acted in the case of goalkeeper Bruno – Photo: Playback / TV Globo
Zanone Junior, one of the lawyers accused of stabbing Jair Bolsonaro, also acted in the case of goalkeeper Bruno – Photo: Playback / TV Globo
The device was seized during a search and seizure operation, but due to the action of the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) filed with the Federal Regional Court (TRF-1), the cell phone experience would be illegal. The TRF-1 presented the analysis of the demand to the Federal Supreme Court (STF), which has not yet authorized or denied the actions of the PF on the device.
