[ad_1]
The case will be analyzed by the President of the STJ, Minister João Otávio Noronha, who is responsible for analyzing this type of appeal (request for suspension of the provisional decision).
AGU has argued that there is no legal obligation to present the results. This is because the fact that an individual is President of the Republic does not mean that he or she does not have the right to privacy and privacy, which are individual rights, which are stone clauses of the Constitution.
Federal judge Ana Lúcia Petri Betto, of the 14th Federal Civil Court of São Paulo, considered that Bolsonaro’s medical report presented by AGU “did not fully comply with the judicial determination” that gave access to the newspaper “O Estado de S. Paulo” . to the President’s Review Reports for Covid-19.
The government turned to TRF-3. On Saturday (2), the judge on duty Mônica Nobre responded to the request of the AGU and suspended the delivery of the exams.
The magistrate gave the journalist five days to analyze and decide on the delivery or not. On Wednesday (6), Judge André Nabarrete decided to maintain Bolsonaro’s obligation to deliver “the reports of all the exams.”
The judge said that, given the importance of the position he has for all Brazilians and the consequences that personal contacts can cause, it is in the public interest that citizens learn about the President’s medical conditions.
“The urgency of guardianship is undeniable, because the pandemic process unfolds daily, with an increase in deaths and infections. The company has to make sure that the President is or is not affected by the disease. Furthermore, the satisfactory nature of the measure is not convincing, since hiding the information would not reassure the population. The disclosure, on the other hand, whatever it is, would give other authorities and citizens knowledge of the state of the President, whose physical and mental integrity is of great interest to the nation, “said the TRF-3 judge.
