[ad_1]
Minister Marcel Vela commented on Friday about the RCC’s decision on the fines, specifying that, starting on May 15, we will have sanction methods on alert. “
Interior Minister Marcel Vela declared on Friday night that the decision of the Constitutional Court on the fines applied during the state of emergency “affects all of Romania”, adding that in the state of alert there will be methods of sanction.
“It does not affect me, it affects all of Romania, because the decision of the Constitutional Court is a time when the state or those who protect the health of the population no longer have coercive tools to take measures against those who break the rules and endanger public health. ” , I repeat, we analyze this situation very quickly and we will certainly have in the perspective of alert methods by which those who make some reprehensible and questionable gestures, break the rules or endanger the lives of their loved ones, to be sanctioned in a one way or another, according to the law, “said Marcel Vela, in a telephone intervention on Digi 24, cited by Agerpres.
What happened to the fines after CCR’s decision?
When asked if more fines had been imposed after the CCR decision, Vela replied: “Several warnings were given, without fines for the provisions of the military ordinances; obviously, sufficient fines were granted for other matters related to the provisions of the Penal Code or Highway Code “.
On Wednesday, the Constitutional Court accepted the notification of the Ombudsman on the provisions of art. 28 of GEO 1/1999, which established the fines for non-compliance with the restrictions during the state of emergency, establishing that they lack clarity, precision and predictability, and establishing the facts whose commission constitutes an infraction is arbitrarily left to the police’s free appreciation.
“In conclusion, the Court determined that the provisions of Article 28 of the Government Emergency Ordinance No. 1/1999, characterized by poor legislative technique, do not meet the requirements of clarity, precision and predictability and, therefore, are incompatible with the fundamental principle of compliance With the Constitution, its supremacy and laws, provided for in article 1, paragraph 5) of the Constitution, as well as the principle of proportional restriction of the exercise of fundamental rights and freedoms, provided in the Article 53, paragraph 2) of the Constitution “, is shown in the CCR decision.
