[ad_1]
Former Minister Varujan Vosganian believes that we are faced with two completely different attitudes from the authorities: the consequences of the epidemic are exaggerated, while the adverse effects of the vaccine are minimized.
Also read: Unprecedented attack on Mircea Dinescu: ‘Ordinary Pusslama’
“Adriana Bunea, a teacher at Schiller High School in Oradea, passed away as a result of the vaccination, without having previously had any health problems. The doctors’ statements raise serious doubts about the veracity of the information on the coronavirus epidemic, suggesting that manipulation trends persist and that the procedures are being carried out in the interest of officials. This is what the director of the Bihor County Hospital states: ““ The presumptive diagnosis was intoxication with an unknown substance. But no connection can be made between the two aspects. It is unlikely to have anything to do with a vaccine. The necropsy examination will support or refute the hospitalization diagnosis. In such a situation, in principle, a forensic autopsy should be performed ”. I have some questions:
a) What does poisoning with unknown substance mean ??? How many times has such a diagnosis been made? Even the most sophisticated poisoning attempts are suspected. Are there other unknown elements in Mendeleev’s Table?
b) If it is of unknown cause, how does the Hospital director know that the death is not related to the vaccine? Who gives you the right to speak for yourself? Or who forces it?
c) What does it mean that “the autopsy examination will support or disprove the hospitalization diagnosis”? Well, what is the hospitalization diagnosis? You have no idea why he died. And do you want the autopsy to confirm it ???
d) “In such a situation, in principle, an autopsy should be performed,” he says. But in all the situations in which there were doubts about the death caused by COVID, why “in principle an autopsy should not have been carried out”?
I think this statement clearly shows that in the case of the epidemic and vaccination we are facing two completely different attitudes, in the first case of exaggerating the consequences of the epidemic, in the second case of minimizing the effects of vaccination, “he wrote. Varujan Vosganian on his Facebook page.
[ad_2]
