The man who dictated Sweden’s strategy in the fight against the new coronavirus: we will immunize ourselves. Wave two, small number of cases – News by sources



[ad_1]

Sweden’s strategy against the coronavirus will ensure that the second wave of the epidemic is only small, unlike other countries that will have to return to travel restrictions, says Anders Tegnell, the architect of Swedish medical policy, according to the Financial Times. .

Also read: POLITICAL VERIFICATION with Dana Budeanu, episode 52: Dănuța explains what happened at the ECHR, in the case of Kovesi

Anders Tegnell, the Swedish epidemiologist who devised the strategy to avoid travel restrictions, estimates that 40% of people living in Stockholm will be immune to Covid-19 by the end of May, giving the country an advantage against a virus. which will be present “very long”.

“In the fall, it will be the second wave. Sweden will have a high level of immunity, and the number of cases will probably be quite small. But Finland will have a very low degree of immunity. Will Finland have to apply full restrictions again? Traffic?” Anders Tegnell said.

Sweden and Anders Tegnell are at the attention of the whole world, in the context in which they had a different reaction to the pandemic.

Primary and secondary schools, cafes, restaurants and shops operate almost normally in Sweden, and authorities rely on voluntary compliance with distance rules and the fact that many employees work from home. Courses for students over the age of 16 were suspended, universities closed, and gatherings of more than 50 people were banned. Sweden has the most relaxed anti-epidemic approach in European countries.

According to data released Thursday, 3,040 deaths were recorded in Sweden. The balance is significantly higher than in neighboring countries such as Denmark, Norway and Finland.

Anders Tegnell says that only in a year or two will it be known which approach worked best and what the costs were for society. The epidemiologist notes that Sweden’s approach has focused on a “broader perspective on public health” in which an important element is that “people can reasonably have a normal life.”



[ad_2]