[ad_1]
A Portuguese appellate court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is illegal to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
The Court stated that the reliability of the test depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the Court concludes that:
“If someone tests positive for PCR when a threshold of 35 cycles or more is used (as is the rule in most labs in Europe and the US), the likelihood of that person becoming infected is less. 3% and the probability that the result is false positive is 97%. “
The court also notes that the cycle threshold used for PCR tests currently being performed in Portugal is unknown.
The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India are between 37-40, making the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate reaches 97%.
Codrin Ștefănescu: I am waiting for Iohannis to be vaccinated and for Arafat to be vaccinated by hand
This case concerned the fact that four people were quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these, one tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other three were considered to be at high risk of exposure.
Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and posed a health hazard, requiring them to be isolated.
The court’s summary: “Given the amount of scientific doubts that exist – as expressed by the experts, that is, those that matter – about the reliability of PCR tests, given the lack of information on the analytical parameters of the tests and In the absence of a medical diagnosis supporting the existence of an infection or risk, there is no way for this court to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or whether A, B and D were at high risk of exposure to the virus. same ‘.
Nelu Tătaru, news from Belgium: Piatra Neamț’s hero doctor will be arrested
It is also important to remember that PCR was invented as a way to create copies of genetic material. It was never intended to be a diagnostic tool.
Standard coronavirus tests return a large number of positive cases on a daily basis. These tests are based on faulty WHO protocols, which are designed to include false positives.
This fact about false positives in PCR tests was first noticed in public by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, Swiss biologist, professor emeritus and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern.
So if we do a corona PCR test on an immune person, no virus is detected, but a small broken part of the viral genome. The test is positive as long as small broken parts of the virus remain. Correct: Even if infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can be positive because the PCR method multiplies even a small part of the viral genetic material enough [pentru a fi detectat].
Previously, the WHO test protocol was even questioned by the Finnish national health authority. (Health impact news)
[ad_2]
